Re: [API-users] GBIF.org supports recordedByID and identifiedByID

Ahhh... Thanks for the swift reply, Tim! Cheers, Jörg Von: Tim Robertson Gesendet: Montag, 6. April 2020 12:17 An: Holetschek, Jörg ; api-users@lists.gbif.org; i...@lists.gbif.org Cc: Daniel Noesgaard Betreff: Re: GBIF.org supports recordedByID and identifiedByID Thanks Jörg, The web

Re: [API-users] GBIF.org supports recordedByID and identifiedByID

Hi Tim, that's great news... thanks! >From the documentation of the GBIF API I get that these IDs can be uses for >searching as well. If I use the example you sent (which returns 27 results) on >the API, I don't get any results:

[API-users] Backbone data as SQL

Hi Christian, I?ve written a small Python script that runs through the DarwinCore archive Markus mentioned, extracts a given list of terms (taxon, vernacular names, but can be extended) and writes bulk files that can be loaded into SQL Server. It?s lacking any documentation (apart from some

[API-users] Crawling paused and new taxonomic backbone

Thanks a lot, Markus! J?rg -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- Von: Markus D?ring [mailto:mdoering at gbif.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016 10:29 An: Holetschek, J?rg Cc: api-users at lists.gbif.org Betreff: Re: [API-users] Crawling paused and new taxonomic backbone Hi J?rg, I have

[API-users] Crawling paused and new taxonomic backbone

Hi Markus, Would it be possible to get this as a taxonomic DarwinCore archive, also with the vernacular names? Just like the previous version? Cheers, J?rg -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- Von: API-users [mailto:api-users-bounces at lists.gbif.org] Im Auftrag von Markus D?ring Gesendet:

[API-users] Download statistics

Great... thanks for the fast reply, Tim! J?rg Von: Tim Robertson [mailto:trobertson at gbif.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. November 2015 15:27 An: Holetschek, J?rg Cc: api-users at lists.gbif.org Betreff: Re: [API-users] Download statistics Hi J?rg, Yes you can. Here is an example:

[API-users] Download statistics

Dear all, I'd like to combine the registry API with the occurrence API to create some download statistics for certain institutions. According to the documentation, datasets are not removed from the registry, but get a "deleted" timestamp when removed. Does the same apply to the occurrence

[API-users] GBIF API v1.0 live

Hi Markus, Great to have the final version of the API available! I used it to find out metadata about datasets from the registry and I found some odd datasets. For BioCASe/DiGIR/TAPIR endpoints, the conceptualSchema usually can be found in the machineTags of the respective endpoint, or in the

[API-users] Dataset contacts

Thanks for the explanation, Markus! Cheers, J?rg Von: Markus D?ring [mailto:mdoering at gbif.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2014 14:19 An: Holetschek, J?rg Cc: api-users at lists.gbif.org; GBIF Developers Developers Betreff: Re: [API-users] Dataset contacts Hi J?rg, this is intended

[API-users] Dataset contacts

Hi guys, I'm using the API to get dataset metadata from the registry (http://api.gbif.org/v0.9/dataset). Each dataset entry has a 'contact' element, which is a list of contacts. Usually, each contact has a certain type. In the given example in the documentation, there are two contacts, each