ror.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m afraid you either need to reduce the size, or take the approach I
>> suggested of a wider search (e.g. a higher taxon) and then post filtering.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope this helps.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
ailto:benjamin.feinsil...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 3 April 2019 at 09.33
To: "api-users@lists.gbif.org<mailto:api-users@lists.gbif.org>"
mailto:api-users@lists.gbif.org>>
Subject: [API-users] Requesting Occurrence Data for Large List of Species
Hello,
If I have a lis
or take the approach I
> suggested of a wider search (e.g. a higher taxon) and then post filtering.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Benjamin Feinsilver
> *Date: *Monday, 8 April 2019 at 05.07
> *To: *Tim
: "api-users@lists.gbif.org"
Subject: Re: [API-users] Requesting Occurrence Data for Large List of Species
Hi Tim,
I received an error message (via email) when attempting to post 300 taxon keys:
"We are sorry, but an error has occurred processing your download."
Please see
isance, and this is a known issue that we do aim to
> address: https://github.com/gbif/portal-feedback/issues/1768
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *API-users on behalf of
> Benjamin Feinsilver
> *Date: *Wednesday, 3 April 2019 at 09.33
>
Requesting Occurrence Data for Large List of Species
Hello,
If I have a list of around 3,000 species, and I would like to request
occurrence data for each species, is it more efficient to use the Search or
Download API?
If using the Download API, could I include the list of species in an external
Hello,
If I have a list of around 3,000 species, and I would like to request
occurrence data for each species, is it more efficient to use the Search or
Download API?
If using the Download API, could I include the list of species in an
external query file and use the "in" predicate? For example:
