On 1/8/13 8:18 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Can anyone confirm or deny the implementation of digital siganture and
product registration?
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_best_practices#Product_Registration
I would like to have an update on these feature requests.
both not
On 1/8/13 8:13 AM, Galileo Teco Juárez wrote:
I wonder if the document
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_best_practices#How_to_write_OpenOffice.org_GUI_Extensions_today
on the part of Extension Features
improvements that are there are the more updated or are somewhere in the
wiki
On 1/17/13 12:24 PM, Bernard Marcelly wrote:
Hello,
I read report 121577 and did not notice the problem.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577
Then I found this in the dev mailing list :
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg02906.html
I noticed that
On 1/17/13 3:00 PM, Bernard Marcelly wrote:
Message de Jürgen Schmidt date 2013-01-17 13:19 :
I disagree, the old mechanism is a design bug and should be resolved. It
was always planned to fix this a major release. Now with 4.0 we can make
such changes and we had long discussions about
On 1/23/13 9:36 AM, Bernard Marcelly wrote:
Hi Ariel and all,
Bug 121582 is very vague and does not detail the proposed changes. It
looks like an intended obfuscation, so that nobody will react in time.
The XSimpleFileAccess is indicated as merely an example, but I will
develop on it.
If
On 1/23/13 3:08 PM, Bernard Marcelly wrote:
Message de Jürgen Schmidt date 2013-01-23 10:12 :
exactly and that means a minor code change and a rebuild. If this kind
of cleanup changes are not allowed with a major release than we do
something wrong. You should not forget the benefit for new
On 6/5/13 2:00 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
If the developers obviously have no clue how to get things right, if
even the project lead seems to be completely clueless about the way his
product works ...
The developers try to improve the program over time and fix design
issues in a major version.
On 9/19/13 12:14 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:46:16PM +0800, Wei Min Teo wrote:
Hi all, Thanks for all replies. The OS that I tested on is
Windows XP. The reason why I started a openoffice process in
listening mode is to run an invisible instance that
On 11/6/13 12:07 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 09/22/2013 07:41 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi all,
Just to update, I have documented my work on the Netbeans plugin related
to 3-Layer removal changes here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123266
I seem to have the plugin working on
On 11/26/13 8:27 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2013/11/26 Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
I think he meant Apache OpenOffice 4.1
Oh… sorry, didn't think of that, since I know there is a 4.1 LibreOffice
version and Apache OpenOffice wasn't mentioned anywhere…
Also, LibreOffice 4.1 is
On 3/6/14 7:56 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
This looks like an omission from the developer, you might
want to submit
a bug.
No, I think not.
Please consider the following example:
On 11/08/14 10:57, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote:
Hi,
This message is just to bring a peculiarity of the SDK to the attention of
the subscribers to this mailing list.
Summary: as of AOO 4.1.0, %origin% is expanded into the Office folder in
the registry subtree of your project (and installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/08/14 13:03, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hello Amenel,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:57:56AM +0100, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote:
Hi, This message is just to bring a peculiarity of the SDK to the
attention of the subscribers to this mailing
Hi,
I would suggest to use only one connection per office process and use
several instances with their own user profile.
Maybe put your own dispatcher in front of your own stuff and dispatch
the incoming API calls to one of the managed office processes.
It make also sense to observe the office
14 matches
Mail list logo
