On 2013-06-12 20:50:05, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 08:34 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>
> > I strongly prefer Proposal #3 over #1, #2 and #4. My personal preference
> > is for 'peer=()' and 'subject=()' instead of 'peer {}' and 'subject {}',
> > but I could live with '{}'. I think I so
On 06/12/2013 08:34 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> I strongly prefer Proposal #3 over #1, #2 and #4. My personal preference
> is for 'peer=()' and 'subject=()' instead of 'peer {}' and 'subject {}',
> but I could live with '{}'. I think I somewhat prefer the access at the
> front (right after dbus)
On 06/12/2013 06:36 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:42:34PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>>> So, here's a first shot at Proposal #4:
>>> [...]
>>> /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver {
>>> # Ignore file and accessibility bus access for this excercise
>>> file,
>>> dbus bus=access
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:25:23AM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
> The patch fixes this problem, but as I already said, I'm not sure if
> it's the best way to fix it. I'm not even sure if it's a bug in our
> extconf.rb, in swig or if mkmf from Ruby 2.0 is buggy ;-)
Your signature is again releva
On 06/12/2013 01:42 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 01:40 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:41:03PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote:
<>
>>> If we distill that down a little bit, it means that the only subj
>>> conditionals that make sense with send are name and label and
On 06/12/2013 01:28 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 02:13 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 2013-06-11 23:30:58, John Johansen wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2013 03:04 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
On 06/11/2013 04:41 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
...
> As a side note, one thing that I'
On 06/12/2013 03:25 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
>> On 06/05/2013 01:23 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
>>> you might have noticed the discussion about the libapparmor ruby
>>> bindings build failures on openSUSE Factory, which is the first
>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:42:34PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> > So, here's a first shot at Proposal #4:
> > [...]
> > /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver {
> > # Ignore file and accessibility bus access for this excercise
> > file,
> > dbus bus=accessibility,
> >
> > # sarnold> I think we cou
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
> On 06/05/2013 01:23 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > you might have noticed the discussion about the libapparmor ruby
> > bindings build failures on openSUSE Factory, which is the first
> > version with ruby 2.0.
> >
> > The problem was tha
On 2013-06-12 11:40:18, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:41:03PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > > * Proposal 3 - Grouping of subject and peer address components
> > >
> > > Based on Steve's suggestion[4] and refined by Jamie[5]. It groups the
> > > connection attributes together ba
On 06/11/2013 08:46 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 06:44:13PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> To start us off, here's the profile using the current DBus syntax. It is
>> complex, but it uses all of the DBus accesses (send, receive, and
>> acquire) and it is representative of what a r
On 06/12/2013 01:40 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:41:03PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> * Proposal 3 - Grouping of subject and peer address components
>>>
>>> Based on Steve's suggestion[4] and refined by Jamie[5]. It groups the
>>> connection attributes together based on wh
On 06/12/2013 02:13 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2013-06-11 23:30:58, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 03:04 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2013 04:41 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
As a side note, one thing that I'm not real happy about is the asymmetry
of send and
Michael has proposed merging lp:~kensington/apparmor/apparmor into lp:apparmor.
Requested reviews:
AppArmor Developers (apparmor-dev)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~kensington/apparmor/apparmor/+merge/169010
The hu linguas is missing a couple of key shortcuts, which can cau
On 2013-06-11 23:30:58, John Johansen wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 03:04 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> > On 06/11/2013 04:41 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> As a side note, one thing that I'm not real happy about is the asymmetry
> >> of send and receive rules.
> >>
> >> When writing a send
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:41:03PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > * Proposal 3 - Grouping of subject and peer address components
> >
> > Based on Steve's suggestion[4] and refined by Jamie[5]. It groups the
> > connection attributes together based on whether it is the subject's
> > connection
> >
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:55:50AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> > Till then, can someone help me out with the use case for the write
> > function of the profile tools? I'm not sure if I'm thinking in the
> > appropriate way. How are users expected to modify the config files?
> > I can understand r
On 06/12/2013 09:25 AM, Kshitij Gupta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday, in the meeting we had started a discussion about configprofiler
> and the comments, which was abruptly interrupted by my net connection. I
> apologise for the same, its very rare for my net connection to behave that
> way.
>
Hello,
Yesterday, in the meeting we had started a discussion about configprofiler
and the comments, which was abruptly interrupted by my net connection. I
apologise for the same, its very rare for my net connection to behave that
way.
I missed out on parts on part of the conversations, I hope to
On 06/11/2013 04:27 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
>> you might have noticed the discussion about the libapparmor ruby
>> bindings build failures on openSUSE Factory, which is the first version
>> with ruby 2.0.
>>
>> The problem was th
On 06/05/2013 01:23 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you might have noticed the discussion about the libapparmor ruby
> bindings build failures on openSUSE Factory, which is the first version
> with ruby 2.0.
>
> The problem was that DESTDIR was added to too many variables, which
> fina
21 matches
Mail list logo
