[apparmor] [patches] avoid building tech doc during build

2016-11-30 Thread Steve Beattie
Hi, Attached are two alternative patches for avoiding the problem of building the parser's techdoc during the build, which introduces the latex stack as build dependencies for downstreams, and is also a source of unrepeatability in the build. The first patch adds building the documentation

Re: [apparmor] wayland paths

2016-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:11:53PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote: > >owner /{,var/}run/user/*/weston-shared-* rw, > Can we kill the first rule? Or at least only have the /var/ path, since > the non-var path is covered by the last rule? I like the "only the /var/ path" option; that's what I went

Re: [apparmor] wayland paths

2016-11-30 Thread Steve Beattie
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:40:21AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > Simon recommends some new paths for Wayland support in comment 8 at > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1507469 > > I propose this patch for trunk: > > > === modified file

Re: [apparmor] [profile] Firefox 50: unavailable websites and many DENIED "/run/shm/org.chromium.*" log entries.

2016-11-30 Thread Simon Deziel
Hi Daniel, On 2016-11-30 01:20 PM, daniel curtis wrote: > Thanks for an answers. So, if I will remove all dbus related entries - > and leave all the rest - everything should be OK, right? Of course I'm > planning to update 12.04 LTS to a more recent release; I'm preparing to > this operation :- )

[apparmor] [profile] Firefox 50: unavailable websites and many DENIED "/run/shm/org.chromium.*" log entries.

2016-11-30 Thread daniel curtis
Hi Simon Thanks for an answers. So, if I will remove all dbus related entries - and leave all the rest - everything should be OK, right? Of course I'm planning to update 12.04 LTS to a more recent release; I'm preparing to this operation :- ) And what about this rule - can I add this one to the