Re: [apparmor] IPC and sockets

2018-02-15 Thread John Johansen
On 02/15/2018 07:21 AM, Viacheslav Salnikov wrote: > OK, let me be more specific: > > does AppArmor complain about communication through the unix domain sockets > into dmesg? > yes > All I've got - AppArmor can restrict access to named unix socket as a file - > because it is a file - without

Re: [apparmor] IPC and sockets

2018-02-15 Thread Seth Arnold
Hi Slava, On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:21:43PM +0200, Viacheslav Salnikov wrote: > does AppArmor complain about communication through the unix domain > sockets into dmesg? AppArmor's kernel mediation uses the audit facility, which on most systems does go through dmesg, but with lossy rate-limiting

Re: [apparmor] IPC and sockets

2018-02-15 Thread Viacheslav Salnikov
OK, let me be more specific: does AppArmor complain about communication through the unix domain sockets into dmesg? All I've got - AppArmor can restrict access to named unix socket as a file - because it is a file - without using "deny unix". Actually, deny unix does not work for me with named