On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:09:55AM +0200, Jonas Große Sundrup wrote:
> The executable in question, in whose profile the ix-confinement did not
> work, was in fact not the executable, but a symlink to it, which I
> didn't directly notice. While htop will then note the process via its
> *executed*
On 2020-08-12, Jonas Große Sundrup wrote:
> Or in other words: where is my mental model of AppArmor still
> incorrect?
After some further experimentation, I think I can now answer my own
question here, if anyone observes a similar problem and happens to find
my original mail:
The executable in
