Hello Seth
>> Hi Daniel, thanks :) This is wonderful to hear.
But that's a pure true. Thanks to You and your answers I understand many
things related to AppArmor etc. Once again; thank You very, very much :- )
>> I'm sorry -- left unsaid with "Switch to Px" is also
>> "write a profile for
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:33:46PM +0200, daniel curtis wrote:
> Thank You for an answers. I understood many things, thanks to You. I
> appreciate it, really.
Hi Daniel, thanks :) This is wonderful to hear.
> First thing; if it's about 'xdg-screensaver' issues etc.; You've written,
> that if I
Hello Seth
Thank You for an answers. I understood many things, thanks to You. I
appreciate it, really.
First thing; if it's about 'xdg-screensaver' issues etc.; You've written,
that if I "don't trust data being supplied to Parole" then I should,
probably, prefer/use the 'Px' rule instead of
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 04:11:04PM +0200, daniel curtis wrote:
> Last year I've created an AppArmor profile for Parole application. However,
> it was done on the 12.04 LTS Release, which is in EoL status now. After
> fresh 16.04 LTS installation and checking log files for any new
> DENIED/ALLOWED
Hello
Last year I've created an AppArmor profile for Parole application. However,
it was done on the 12.04 LTS Release, which is in EoL status now. After
fresh 16.04 LTS installation and checking log files for any new
DENIED/ALLOWED entries (Parole was in a "complain" mode), I was surprised
that
