[apple-crop-2] The inventor of the "Darwin" thinning machine passed away
I imagine some of you knew Hermann Gessler from Friedrichshafen. He is best known for Darwin, but his garage was full of great inventions. I was very sad this evening to learn that he passed away in a ULO apple storage incident Vincent Philion De: Peter Triloff mailto:peter.tril...@lindavino.de>> Objet: Rép : Easter is not resurrection this year. Will we meet again soon? Date: 6 avril 2021 à 19:16:28 HAE À: Vincent Philion mailto:vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca>> Hi Vincent, … There are also some bad news because Hermann Gessler, the inventor of « Elise" and "Darwin" passed away 10 days ago; he suffocated while taking a fruit sample through the window of an ULO store. He suffered from a slipped disc and the idea is that he probably couldn´t move for a few moments because of some pain, breathing the storage atmosphere... ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [apple-crop-2] still viable?
It would need a major reboot. Vincent Philion Le 1 févr. 2021 à 10:30, Harold Schooley a écrit : Good question Evan. Been wondering the same thing myself. Harold Schooley From: apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.com [mailto:apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.com] On Behalf Of Evan B. Milburn Sent: February-01-21 7:38 AM To: apple crop Subject: [apple-crop-2] still viable? Is anyone still using apple crop or has every one going else where? I have not seen anything on it for months. ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [apple-crop-2] What to do when fireblight hits tall spindle
Seems my previous attempt never reached the listserv: I entirely agree with Kari (Hi Kari!), The Terminal bud is the best solution for stopping fire blight. Once growth stops, you don’t have to worry about hail or anything else. So at this point, I would also recommend waiting after harvest. You could consider keeping your picking staff an extra few days to clean up the fire blight if that’s possible. When trees are actively growing, different story: Quick Pruning is extremely useful when the first symptoms appear. We consider cleaning shears a hassle. It just slows down operations without measurable benefit. Making sure pruning crews are aware that they CAN spread the disease if they are careless is much more useful than sterilizing. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Microbiologiste/Phytopathologiste (pomiculture) Institut de recherche et de développement en agro-environnement Research and Development Institute for the Agri-Environment www.irda.qc.ca<http://www.irda.qc.ca/> Centre de recherche 335, Rang des Vingt-Cinq Est Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville (Québec) J3V 0G7 vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca<mailto:vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca> Bureau: 450 653-7368 poste 350 Cellulaire: 514-623-8275 Skype: VENTURIA Télécopie: 450 653-1927 Verger expérimental 330, Rang des vingt-cinq Est Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville (Québec) J3V 4P6 Téléphone et télécopieur : 450 653-8375 Local pesticide: 450-653-7608 Fiers héritiers du travail des frères Saint-Gabriel: http://arboretum8gabrielis.wordpress.com<http://arboretum8gabrielis.wordpress.com/> ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [apple-crop-2] What to do when fireblight hits tall spindle
I entirely agree with Kari (Hi Kari!), The Terminal bud is the best solution for stopping fire blight. Once growth stops, you don’t have to worry about hail or anything else. So at this point, I would also recommend waiting after harvest. You could consider keeping your picking staff an extra few days to clean up the fire blight if that’s possible. When trees are actively growing, different story: Quick Pruning is extremely useful when the first symptoms appear. We consider cleaning shears a hassle. It just slows down operations without measurable benefit. Making sure pruning crews are aware that they CAN spread the disease if they are careless is much more useful than sterilizing. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Microbiologiste/Phytopathologiste (pomiculture) Institut de recherche et de développement en agro-environnement Research and Development Institute for the Agri-Environment www.irda.qc.ca<http://www.irda.qc.ca> Centre de recherche 335, Rang des Vingt-Cinq Est Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville (Québec) J3V 0G7 vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca<mailto:vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca> Bureau: 450 653-7368 poste 350 Cellulaire: 514-623-8275 Skype: VENTURIA Télécopie: 450 653-1927 Verger expérimental 330, Rang des vingt-cinq Est Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville (Québec) J3V 4P6 Téléphone et télécopieur : 450 653-8375 Local pesticide: 450-653-7608 Fiers héritiers du travail des frères Saint-Gabriel: http://arboretum8gabrielis.wordpress.com ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
[Apple-Crop] Pierre Philion past away...
Many people in the apple production community knew him: Pierre Philion, agronomist, died at 77, on Friday, September 1, 2017. Growing apples was his life. He left us a few days before harvest, like mature fruit waiting to be picked. In our family, the apple production cycle dictated our lives. This time won’t be any different. We will spend the harvest time with him close to our hearts, before a last goodbye. Funerals will be held after the apple season at the catholic church of his hometown of Hemmingford, Québec on Saturday, October 14. The family will be present at 9h30, ahead of the ceremony at 11h00. ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Shopping list: Looking for insight on flyspeck, fire blight, pheromone trap thresholds
Hi! Won’t answer about SBFS, but hopefully someone will. ;-) My 2 cents for other disease stuff: 2) Fire blight Why is Regulaid specified as a penetrant adjuvant for use with streptomycin applications during bloom? Does it have unique characteristics that make it better for this purpose than other penetrants such as LI700? We don’t have Regulaid, but I can tell you substituting for LI700 doesn’t work for Kasumin. Never tried with Strep. We had reduced efficacy when LI700 was mixed with Kasumin. If grower is applying captan at same time, has much strep efficacy is lost by not adding the penetrant to the mix to avoid captan phytotoxicity? It’s interesting you mix strep with fungicides considering this should reduce strep efficacy: Goodman, Robert N., 1964: Compatibility of streptomycin with some fungicides and insecticides. Plant Dis Reporter: 180-181 If there is none or even minimal active fire blight in the orchard, is there reason to spray strep after hail damage? I see none whatsoever. My take on it has been to not bother as long as you are just cutting fire blight out, and that it is more important to remove fire blight as soon as possible. I didn’t change my opinion since we wrote that about 10 years ago. But this question keeps coming back. Toussaint, V., et V. Philion. 2007. Natural Epidemic of Fire Blight in a Newly Planted Orchard and Effect of Pruning on Disease Development. In XI International Workshop on Fire Blight 793, 313‑320. ISHS. Do we all agree that strep provides protection for a flower for about 2-3 days? Yes. But since the flower has a finite life and gets more difficult to colonize as it ages, there is no point in respraying the same flower. Though I can imagine scenario with temps around 90F where a single cohort of flowers could be vulnerable to a second fire blight infection period after receiving a strep application. I can’t. Show me how this is possible! Bye for now, Vincent Philion, agr. ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] More on FB
Hi! I have no idea about the effect of copper content in soil on FB management. That’s a new one for me. I tried to look it up, but couldn’t find anything. For FB, removing “any” stress is not a silver bullet though. As mentioned in previous posts, some water stress can save your trees when FB strikes. Vincent > Le 22 mai 2017 à 08:37, lee elliotta écrit : > > I have been adding copper (Kocide) to my glysofate tank when spraying weeds > in an effort to get more copper into the soil, Kocide is cheap, water > soluable, Every time I have done leaf anayisis copper is way deficient in the > leaf, I think this defieciancy makes the tree more suceptable to FB, do the > experts think this may work? It cant hurt anything, This is midwest soil, is > copper short in other area too?, I have learned that removing any stress from > the tree will get you success, Lee Elliott Upstart Nursery, Winchester, > Illinois > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Ideas on FB
Strep works very well for blossom blight, until abuse brings it down (resistance). Sticking to bloom sprays and making sure it’s applied only when it’s needed is key. > sceptical that these antobiotic sprays work at all, only good for the blooms > and chemical dealers, ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Ideas on FB
Hi! it would be interesting to define “cool” in the southern California context. ;-) Temperature in the mid-90 (35 ℃ for the rest of the planet) (or more) clearly isn’t favorable for blight. Flowers age faster at that temperature, while the bacteria is slowed down. Plus, if the trees are under water stress the bacteria can’t progress normally. Your “cool” is our “warm” and that’s why we struggle with FB, but also scab and CM. Vincent > Le 22 mai 2017 à 00:29, kuffelcr...@kuffelcreek.com a écrit : > > A long, cool spring here in Southern California allowed quite a few FB > strikes, three days in the low to mid-90's stopped it in its tracks. > Formerly limp shoots with sticky ooze and now crispy and dry, and pruned > stumps do not get re-infection. That's all I'll see of it until next > spring, weeks of 100+ weather and 5% humidity sees to that. Unfortunately > it doesn't slow down the CM a bit, which is my next nemesis on the > calendar. > > Kevin Hauser > Kuffel Creek Apple Nursery > Riverside, California > Nakifuma, Uganda > > On Mon, 22 May 2017 02:45:06 + (UTC), lee elliott> wrote: >> For the first year ever I havent seen any FB here is western Illinois, >> could it be th 86 degree days we had burned it out, I believe FB burns > out >> after a few hot days, some dont believe this but experience has taught > me >> it is true, Shoot bligt and root sucker blight has allways been a > problem, >> I am sceptical that these antobiotic sprays work at all, only good for > the >> blooms and chemical dealers, Copper does work well on young hursery and >> non-bearing trees that get shoot blight where your not woried about > fruit >> finish, My person opiniion, low soil levels of copper, (do a leaf > anayisis) >> make the tree stressed and contribute to FB. Just my 2 cents worth, Lee >> Elliott, Upstart Nursery, Winchester Illinois >> ___ >> apple-crop mailing list >> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Fireblight
Hi! Once a flower opens, it needs to get contaminated by an insect and then the population needs to multiply to 100,000 before wetting, otherwise the infection is a dud. That takes 36 hrs when the conditions are perfect for the bacteria (28°C, 82°F), and considerably longer when the temperature is cooler. In other words, spraying the day before the infection is never a problem. In most (if not all) scenarios, sprays every 48 hours covers all the risk. Of course, longer intervals are quite sufficient when the temperature is cooler. Optimizing spray frequency was our goal when we designed RIMpro. Vincent Le 21 mai 2017 à 15:52, Arthur Kelly> a écrit : Thanks, I was more wondering how close to try and get to the infection period due sometime tomorrow morning. We are mostly in bloom with some varieties nearly complete petal fall and others (honeycrisp) at full bloom. There are very few flowers still to open and I expect that this will be the only strep spray necessary. The forecast is slight chance of showers daily going forward. Sent from my iPhone ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Fireblight
Hi all, My two cents: Although streptomycin is degraded by light, this doesn’t really matter: For two to four days, the antibiotic keeps bacterial population at low levels on sprayed flowers. Once it’s degraded, the flower is also 2 to 4 days older and there is simply not enough time left for the bacteria to multiply back to detrimental levels and infect. Pusey demonstrated quite well that as flower age, they carry less bacteria and become increasingly more difficult to infect. Bottom line: Opened flowers that are sprayed stay protected for the life of that flower. As Quan underlined, you should mostly concentrate on flowers unopened at spraying time: 1) How many flowers weren’t open on the last strep spray? 2) Will the weather for these flowers be conducive for bacteria multiplication and infection? If so, then you need to consider additional sprays for unsprayed flowers. Trapman and myself developed RIMpro-Erwinia to help manage which flowers are at risk and at need for a spray. This model is very different from Cougar and Maryblyt and is proving more reliable. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Microbiologiste/Phytopathologiste (pomiculture) Institut de recherche et de développement en agro-environnement Research and Development Institute for the Agri-Environment www.irda.qc.ca<http://www.irda.qc.ca/> ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Cueva/Double Nickel
If we “must" continue this: > Our injury results seem to follow the acute toxicity/exposure phenomenon, > whereby injury is higher when the concentration is higher not more dilute. > This is not unlike when one is exposed to a toxin in water, air, or direct > contact. In orchard trials, reducing volume and maintaining coverage requires adequate spraying technology. i/e Not a gun. What does your spray deposit look like in your trials? Copper ions in large droplets (or high volume) react with leaf tissue until the water evaporates. Small droplets evaporate quicker and reduce the toxicity. This is something you can’t see if you paint the trees with a film of water using a gun. When you attempt to reduce volume using the same gun, all you do is apply “less” droplets… But they are still slow drying big droplets. So you are likely to conclude more concentrated material is more toxic… This is not surprising, right? But not so relevant to orchard spraying with small droplets. Conclusions drawn from trials performed with guns using large droplets are not always directly applicable with airblast sprayers. it’s Happy hour time = Drinking 2 beers or one glass of wine is the same for the alcool test, right? But beer “rental” is shorter than for wine because that excess volume can’t stay in your bladder so long. So for a given metabolic rate I’m betting alcohol in your blood is higher with beer. i/e beer would get you hammered quicker than wine. I could be wrong, but at least it’s cheaper. Point is: concentration vs volume is not so straightforward and spray application technology can greatly impact results. caveat emptor. Vincent ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Cueva/Double Nickel
Hi Kerik, It would certainly be interesting to understand why results differ so greatly. It’s unfortunate that companies insist on high volume spraying. Aside from the russeting issue, there are many good reasons to reduce spray volume (in relation to tree size). It’s also unfortunate most trials are done with a handgun (and no air assist?), resulting in a droplet spectrum size and spray distribution very different from what growers actually use. In any case, the good news is your results imply that Cueva is very safe to use, even at high volume. Were you running oxychloride with a similar copper concentration alongside Cueva? Vincent Le 1 mai 2017 à 09:59, Kerik D. Cox <kd...@cornell.edu<mailto:kd...@cornell.edu>> a écrit : Hi Vincent, I'm sorry that our trials resulted in the opposite expectation. Most of the company protocols ask me to apply their products at 100 gal/A. I guess they were hoping to increase the chance of showing product injury at my field days. I thought it was a more universal tree row volume for apples, my mistake. The field crews at Geneva and Ithaca sprays everything at 100 gal/A. I guess it's an underhanded attempt to potentially injure our plots with copper. With all my dilute handgun applications, I'm surprised that I don't have potatoes. I guess I keep getting lucky. Best, Kerik Hi Kerik, I don’t know how much experience you actually have with airblast sprayer trials varying volume, but this is something we do routinely. Evidence of copper injury with high volume sprays dates back (at least) to 1972. Look it up. Classic experiments demonstrate the same amount of copper can defoliate plants or result in no injury, just by varying volume. Let’s say I have a hard time “swallowing” your aspirin analogy…! Let’s stick to apples, OK? The fact that labels require you to apply large volumes of water doesn’t make it a sound or sensible advice. Most likely, the labels reflect the trial conditions. And most trials in the USA are run with high volume….! Vincent Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:31, Kerik D. Cox <kd...@cornell.edu<mailto:kd...@cornell.edu>> a écrit : Hi Vincent, We've found that concentration is potentially more damaging with copper than higher volumes as the both 50gal and 100gal get the same amount of copper. It's like taking powdered aspirin with half the recommended amount of water. Also, many labels in the US actually require that certain products be applied in a minimum of 100 gal/A. If were potentially injurious to apply at 100 gal/A, I assure you that no company would include any such statements on label. Actually, they would, without a doubt, put statements saying that the product should not be applied at 100 gal/A or injury would occur. Excess water seems to just roll off the trees in our experiments. Best, Kerik I hope you meant a Low volume of water. High volume = slow drying = russeting. This is very easy to demonstrate. We do it as a "control" in plots. We always have copper induced russeting at 500 L/ha and none at 225 L/ha. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:05, Two Onion Farm <far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com>> a écrit : Kerik Cox at Cornell has done trials with this combination for cedar apple rust, summer fungal diseases, and fireblight and has had good results. We started using the combination in our organic orchard last year and did not see any problems with fruit russeting. Kerik did caution me to use a high volume of water to avoid toxicity from the copper (100 gallons per acre vs our normal 50 in our high density orchard). We have used 2 qts/acre Cueva + 2 lbs/acre 2ble nickel. Kerik also suggested that the 2ble nickel might be unnecessary and that cueva alone might be sufficient, but that may be theoretical at this point. The 2ble nickel does add a lot of cost. Chris Chris & Juli McGuire Two Onion Farm www.twoonionfarm.com<http://www.twoonionfarm.com/> 19638 Cottage Inn Road Belmont, WI 53510 (608) 762-5335 far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com> On 5/1/2017 6:43 AM, maurice tougas wrote: A couple years ago I recall discussion regarding the use of Cueva/Double Nickel combination as an alternative and/or rotation with strep for fireblight management. Is anyone aware of further research regarding this combination esp as to regards to crop safety and efficacy ? Mo Tougas -- Maurice Tougas Tougas Family Farm Northborough,MA 01532 508-450-0844 ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___
Re: [Apple-Crop] Cueva/Double Nickel
Hi Kerik, I don’t know how much experience you actually have with airblast sprayer trials varying volume, but this is something we do routinely. Evidence of copper injury with high volume sprays dates back (at least) to 1972. Look it up. Classic experiments demonstrate the same amount of copper can defoliate plants or result in no injury, just by varying volume. Let’s say I have a hard time “swallowing” your aspirin analogy…! Let’s stick to apples, OK? The fact that labels require you to apply large volumes of water doesn’t make it a sound or sensible advice. Most likely, the labels reflect the trial conditions. And most trials in the USA are run with high volume….! Vincent Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:31, Kerik D. Cox <kd...@cornell.edu<mailto:kd...@cornell.edu>> a écrit : Hi Vincent, We've found that concentration is potentially more damaging with copper than higher volumes as the both 50gal and 100gal get the same amount of copper. It's like taking powdered aspirin with half the recommended amount of water. Also, many labels in the US actually require that certain products be applied in a minimum of 100 gal/A. If were potentially injurious to apply at 100 gal/A, I assure you that no company would include any such statements on label. Actually, they would, without a doubt, put statements saying that the product should not be applied at 100 gal/A or injury would occur. Excess water seems to just roll off the trees in our experiments. Best, Kerik I hope you meant a Low volume of water. High volume = slow drying = russeting. This is very easy to demonstrate. We do it as a "control" in plots. We always have copper induced russeting at 500 L/ha and none at 225 L/ha. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:05, Two Onion Farm <far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com>> a écrit : Kerik Cox at Cornell has done trials with this combination for cedar apple rust, summer fungal diseases, and fireblight and has had good results. We started using the combination in our organic orchard last year and did not see any problems with fruit russeting. Kerik did caution me to use a high volume of water to avoid toxicity from the copper (100 gallons per acre vs our normal 50 in our high density orchard). We have used 2 qts/acre Cueva + 2 lbs/acre 2ble nickel. Kerik also suggested that the 2ble nickel might be unnecessary and that cueva alone might be sufficient, but that may be theoretical at this point. The 2ble nickel does add a lot of cost. Chris Chris & Juli McGuire Two Onion Farm www.twoonionfarm.com<http://www.twoonionfarm.com/> 19638 Cottage Inn Road Belmont, WI 53510 (608) 762-5335 far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com> On 5/1/2017 6:43 AM, maurice tougas wrote: A couple years ago I recall discussion regarding the use of Cueva/Double Nickel combination as an alternative and/or rotation with strep for fireblight management. Is anyone aware of further research regarding this combination esp as to regards to crop safety and efficacy ? Mo Tougas -- Maurice Tougas Tougas Family Farm Northborough,MA 01532 508-450-0844 ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop -- Kerik D. Cox, Ph.D., Associate Professor Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University 221 Barton Lab NYSAES 630 West North Street Geneva, NY 14456 USA E-mail: kd...@cornell.edu<mailto:kd...@cornell.edu> Faculty Office: (315) 787-2401 Fruit Pathology Lab: (315) 787-2402 FAX: (315) 787-2389 ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Cueva/Double Nickel
On the topic of copper: you don't need to spend extra for Cueva. Use of standard oxychloride at a low dose is just as good in most instances. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:05, Two Onion Farm <far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com>> a écrit : Kerik Cox at Cornell has done trials with this combination for cedar apple rust, summer fungal diseases, and fireblight and has had good results. We started using the combination in our organic orchard last year and did not see any problems with fruit russeting. Kerik did caution me to use a high volume of water to avoid toxicity from the copper (100 gallons per acre vs our normal 50 in our high density orchard). We have used 2 qts/acre Cueva + 2 lbs/acre 2ble nickel. Kerik also suggested that the 2ble nickel might be unnecessary and that cueva alone might be sufficient, but that may be theoretical at this point. The 2ble nickel does add a lot of cost. Chris Chris & Juli McGuire Two Onion Farm www.twoonionfarm.com<http://www.twoonionfarm.com/> 19638 Cottage Inn Road Belmont, WI 53510 (608) 762-5335 far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com> On 5/1/2017 6:43 AM, maurice tougas wrote: A couple years ago I recall discussion regarding the use of Cueva/Double Nickel combination as an alternative and/or rotation with strep for fireblight management. Is anyone aware of further research regarding this combination esp as to regards to crop safety and efficacy ? Mo Tougas -- Maurice Tougas Tougas Family Farm Northborough,MA 01532 508-450-0844 ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Cueva/Double Nickel
I hope you meant a Low volume of water. High volume = slow drying = russeting. This is very easy to demonstrate. We do it as a "control" in plots. We always have copper induced russeting at 500 L/ha and none at 225 L/ha. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. Le 1 mai 2017 à 08:05, Two Onion Farm <far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com>> a écrit : Kerik Cox at Cornell has done trials with this combination for cedar apple rust, summer fungal diseases, and fireblight and has had good results. We started using the combination in our organic orchard last year and did not see any problems with fruit russeting. Kerik did caution me to use a high volume of water to avoid toxicity from the copper (100 gallons per acre vs our normal 50 in our high density orchard). We have used 2 qts/acre Cueva + 2 lbs/acre 2ble nickel. Kerik also suggested that the 2ble nickel might be unnecessary and that cueva alone might be sufficient, but that may be theoretical at this point. The 2ble nickel does add a lot of cost. Chris Chris & Juli McGuire Two Onion Farm www.twoonionfarm.com<http://www.twoonionfarm.com/> 19638 Cottage Inn Road Belmont, WI 53510 (608) 762-5335 far...@twoonionfarm.com<mailto:far...@twoonionfarm.com> On 5/1/2017 6:43 AM, maurice tougas wrote: A couple years ago I recall discussion regarding the use of Cueva/Double Nickel combination as an alternative and/or rotation with strep for fireblight management. Is anyone aware of further research regarding this combination esp as to regards to crop safety and efficacy ? Mo Tougas -- Maurice Tougas Tougas Family Farm Northborough,MA 01532 508-450-0844 ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com<mailto:apple-crop@virtualorchard.com> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Serenade
Ok, more seriously: Serenade does have some efficacy against FB and a number of diseases. But I really wonder on the return on money spent on it compared to anything else we spray. Maybe I'm wrong. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. > Le 2 avr. 2017 à 13:13, Kim Logan <kelke...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Have been using serenaded and strep during bloom for a couple of years and > haven't had any fire blight. Don't know if it works or not though. > > On April 2, 2017, at 11:58, Vincent Philion <vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca> > wrote: > > Does anyone have any positive experience with Serenade on anything? > > Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. > >> Le 2 avr. 2017 à 12:49, Daniel Cooley <dcoo...@umass.edu> a écrit : >> >> Norm Lalancette did some tests on peaches. It didn’t work. >> >> Dan >> >> >>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Arthur Kelly <kellyorcha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone have any experience with Serenade for brown rot? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> ___ >>> apple-crop mailing list >>> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >>> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop >> >> ___ >> apple-crop mailing list >> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Serenade
... strep is great against FB. no doubt. Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. > Le 2 avr. 2017 à 13:13, Kim Logan <kelke...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Have been using serenaded and strep during bloom for a couple of years and > haven't had any fire blight. Don't know if it works or not though. > > On April 2, 2017, at 11:58, Vincent Philion <vincent.phil...@irda.qc.ca> > wrote: > > Does anyone have any positive experience with Serenade on anything? > > Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. > >> Le 2 avr. 2017 à 12:49, Daniel Cooley <dcoo...@umass.edu> a écrit : >> >> Norm Lalancette did some tests on peaches. It didn’t work. >> >> Dan >> >> >>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Arthur Kelly <kellyorcha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone have any experience with Serenade for brown rot? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> ___ >>> apple-crop mailing list >>> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >>> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop >> >> ___ >> apple-crop mailing list >> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
Re: [Apple-Crop] Serenade
Does anyone have any positive experience with Serenade on anything? Vincent Philion, agr., M.Sc. > Le 2 avr. 2017 à 12:49, Daniel Cooley <dcoo...@umass.edu> a écrit : > > Norm Lalancette did some tests on peaches. It didn’t work. > > Dan > > >> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Arthur Kelly <kellyorcha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Does anyone have any experience with Serenade for brown rot? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> ___ >> apple-crop mailing list >> apple-crop@virtualorchard.com >> http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop > > ___ > apple-crop mailing list > apple-crop@virtualorchard.com > http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop ___ apple-crop mailing list apple-crop@virtualorchard.com http://virtualorchard.com/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop