Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

2009-01-29 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Bojan Smojver wrote: On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 04:03 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Does the perl glue not being built / installed correctly on CentOS count ? [I had spoken too soon before when I was all excited] If there is a problem with libapreq2 RPMS on CentOS, let me know what the fix is.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

2009-01-29 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:53 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: I built from SVN or do you mean you'll add a patch to the rpm after release ? I thought you were referring to current RPM build/install there. If there is a problem with build/install on CentOS from source and we know how to fix

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

2009-01-29 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:53 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: That is bunk. We shoul NEVER try to support svn builds for releases, because that makes us dependent on whatever autocruft is on CentOS. It also doesn't help diddly squat when testing a potential candidate for release, since those are