call me crazy, but putting that in libapreq2 seems like it would:
bloat the code with unnecessary api functions (as not everyone would
use it - i only use session stuff on 1 of 4 projects that are running
under libapreq)
create new avenues for bugs
add new functions/logic for the de
Max Kellermann wrote:
>
> On 2005/09/22 14:11, Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way: it may be based on libapreq2. And if I come into it,
> > then what about the following idea: to add some authentication
> > functions to libapreq2; In any case, it already does most of the
> > work
On 2005/09/22 14:11, Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way: it may be based on libapreq2. And if I come into it,
> then what about the following idea: to add some authentication
> functions to libapreq2; In any case, it already does most of the
> work, including GET/POST parameter mani
