On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:47 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/17 20:23, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> James Cowgill wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8.6-1&stamp=1488829841&raw=0
ackage tracker
> This package tracker is b
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #836708 {Done: "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
} [aptitude] aptitude: refuses to upgrade packages,
'g' says "Actions: no changes"
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #836708 to the same values
previously set
--
836708: http
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On 2017-03-06 22:57:18 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2016-09-05 02:33 Vincent Lefevre:
> > On 2016-09-05 01:50:04 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > In the UI, I've selected various packages for upgrade; I can see
> > > no breakages. But the 'g' key doesn't
Quoting Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo (2017-03-06 22:33:18)
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> 2016-10-21 11:22 Jonas Smedegaard:
> >Package: aptitude
> >Version: 0.8.3-1+b1
> >Severity: important
> >
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA256
> >
> >Aptitude has thrown
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #707324 [aptitude] aptitude: hint users about [added] alternative
dependencies on upgrade/install
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #707324 [aptitude] aptitude: hint users about [added] alternative
dependencies on upgrade/install
Marked Bug
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi,
2013-06-02 05:12 Christoph Anton Mitterer:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 09:40 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
Personally I dont have trouble with that. Although it does place some
burden on the administrator, the information is well structured and
cert
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #707322 [aptitude] aptitude: show which dependencies (or
suggests/recommends/enhances) a package would loose on upgrade
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #707322 [aptitude] aptitude: show which dependencies (or
suggests/recommends/enhances)
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-12-02 10:44 Ulrich Klauer:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1+b2
Severity: important
When running an "aptitude safe-upgrade" on a Debian testing system that,
among other things, was meant to upgrade the apt package (from 1.3.1 to
1.4~beta1), I got this output:
..
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #846570 [aptitude] aptitude: Fails when trying to upgrade apt
Marked Bug as done
--
846570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-09-05 01:50 Vincent Lefevre:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: normal
In the UI, I've selected various packages for upgrade; I can see
no breakages. But the 'g' key doesn't have any effect, it just
says: "[1(1)/...] Actions: no
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #836708 [aptitude] aptitude: refuses to upgrade packages, 'g' says
"Actions: no changes"
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #836708 [aptitude] aptitude: refuses to upgrade packages, 'g' says
"Actions: no changes"
Marked Bug as done
--
8367
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Jonas,
2016-10-21 11:22 Jonas Smedegaard:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1+b1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Aptitude has thrown me into limbo (hence severity important):
A kernel update failed (ran out of space in /boot,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #841506 [aptitude] aptitude: cannot reinstall package available as update
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
841506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841506
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi,
2017-02-20 00:31 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man8/aptitude-curses.8.gz
Man page says
/etc/apt/apt.conf, /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/*, ~/.aptitude/config
The configuration fi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #855543 [aptitude] clarify configuration files on man page
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #855543 [aptitude] clarify configuration files on man page
Marked Bug as done
--
855543: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855543
De
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-08-21 06:21 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man8/aptitude-curses.8.gz
At
-t , --target-release
Set the release from which packages should be installed. For
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #834967 [aptitude] say -t is different than /
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #834967 [aptitude] say -t is different than /
Marked Bug as done
--
834967: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834967
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
Hi,
On 06/03/17 20:23, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> James Cowgill wrote:
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8.6-1&stamp=1488829841&raw=0
>>>ackage tracker
This package tracker is better than the old one on many aspects (easy to
extend, more dyna
Hi James,
James Cowgill wrote:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8.6-1&stamp=1488829841&raw=0
> >
> > Again some tool in the documentation tool chain segfaults on mips64el.
>
> Done.
Thanks for the prompt reaction!
> This bug in libxml2 is Loongson
Control: close -1
Hi Josh and Ian,
2011-02-13 21:44 Josh Triplett:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3.2
Severity: normal
In doing an upgrade from lenny to squeeze, I noticed that diffutils and
isc-dhcp-client got automatically installed due to dependencies from
diff and dhcp3-client respecti
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #613276 [aptitude] aptitude didn't mark an automatically installed package
as automatically installed
Marked Bug as done
--
613276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613276
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Hi,
On 06/03/17 20:09, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Dear mips64el Buildd Admins,
>
> can you please giveback aptitude/0.8.6-1 on mips64el?
>
> Axel Beckert wrote on 25. Jan. 2017:
>> According to
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8.5-1&stamp=1485311229&raw=0
Dear mips64el Buildd Admins,
can you please giveback aptitude/0.8.6-1 on mips64el?
Axel Beckert wrote on 25. Jan. 2017:
> According to
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8.5-1&stamp=1485311229&raw=0
> something (probably xsltproc) segfaulted while buildi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #573626 [aptitude] Terrible Interactive Search Performance
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #573626 [aptitude] Terrible Interactive Search Performance
Marked Bug as done
--
573626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573626
De
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:30:54 +0100
with message-id <20170306193052.uaya2vnqjpn4r...@reva.itsari.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#836265: aptitude: keeps reselecting sysvinit
has caused the Debian Bug report #836265,
regarding aptitude: keeps reselecting sysvinit
to be marked as done.
T
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
Bug #836265 [aptitude] aptitude: keeps reselecting sysvinit
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #836265 [aptitude] aptitude: keeps reselecting sysvinit
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
836265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836265
De
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
2016-09-01 12:24 Sven Joachim:
If so, the bug might be that aptitude considers any version essential
even if only a non-candidate version is marked as essential.
Note that apt behaves the same way, see #216768. See also the changelog
entry for 0.8.1-1:
Haha how sad, now I can't even test it. With some in between use of apt-get the
issue receded here even on 8.5. Thanks for fixing it though! 😀
___
Aptitude-devel mailing list
Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:08:45 +0100
with message-id <20170306190843.fwicvtdjc3yd6...@reva.itsari.org>
and subject line Re: libapt-pkg5.0: aptitude aborts due to a fd leak
has caused the Debian Bug report #826783,
regarding libapt-pkg5.0: aptitude aborts due to a fd leak
to be marked a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #855288 [aptitude] aptitude internal error
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
855288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
_
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
___
Aptitude-devel mailing list
Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841875: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841875,
regarding better message for build-dep error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855329: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #855329,
regarding aptitude: please, fix a minor mistake in Russian translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#853037: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #853037,
regarding aptitude: debtags view: duplicate tags, some with missing description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#852666: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #852666,
regarding aptitude: FTBFS with Google Mock releases before 1.8.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#849370: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #849370,
regarding aptitude: Aptitude crashes with SIGABRT on install command
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841347: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841347,
regarding packages are not marked as auto "i A" in aptitude
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837946: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837946,
regarding aptitude: actions causing »aptitude received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.«
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:33:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831858: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831858,
regarding aptitude sets already auto-installed packages as manually installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:33:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#836567: fixed in aptitude 0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #836567,
regarding aptitude: [PATCH] aborts on encountering new DepCompareOp flags
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 23:19:57 +0100
Source: aptitude
Binary: aptitude aptitude-common aptitude-doc-cs aptitude-doc-en
aptitude-doc-es aptitude-doc-fi aptitude-doc-fr aptitude-doc-it aptitude-doc-ja
aptitude-doc-nl aptitud
aptitude_0.8.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aptitude_0.8.6-1.dsc
aptitude_0.8.6.orig.tar.xz
aptitude_0.8.6-1.debian.tar.xz
aptitude-common_0.8.6-1_all.deb
aptitude-dbgsym_0.8.6-1_amd64.deb
aptitude-doc-cs_0.8.6-1_all.deb
aptitude-doc-en_0.8.
42 matches
Mail list logo