On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:46:59PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> - somehow try to use the same width of the current terminal, with
> possible truncation (would work fine in pipes for which the ultimate
> output is the same terminal, but not if redirected and processed/seen
>
Hi,
2016-08-16 19:18 Javier Cantero:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:25:40PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
The reasoning for the change was that with pipes/redirections the
concept of "terminal" and consequently "width" is lost. If it's
redirected it's possibly/likely that it's
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:25:40PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> The reasoning for the change was that with pipes/redirections the
> concept of "terminal" and consequently "width" is lost. If it's
> redirected it's possibly/likely that it's because it's moved and
> processed
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> In the past it was just hardcoded to "80 columns", so your example when
> doing it with and without pipe/redirection will have looked different as
> well -- unless the terminal that you are using is 80-column wide, of
> course. (See attachment,
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Javier,
Javier Cantero wrote:
> Compare this:
>
> $ aptitude search "~i aptitude"
> i aptitude0.8.3-1
>- gestor de paquetes basado en terminal
> i A aptitude-common
5 matches
Mail list logo
