[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 844300 - moreinfo Bug #844300 [aptitude] aptitude can put the package system in a broken state with different versions of a MultiArch package Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

On 2016-11-22 12:36:32 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > In any case, if the dependencies are correct, the package system > > should never be put in a broken state. > > I'm sorry but that's wrong. Maintainer scripts can still put packages > in a broken state even if

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: Bug#844300: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi Vincent, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-11-22 12:36:32 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > In any case, if the dependencies are correct, the package system > > > should never be put in a broken state. > > > > I'm sorry but that's wrong.

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#844300: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #844300 [aptitude] aptitude can put the package system in a broken state with different versions of a MultiArch package Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 844300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844300 Debian Bug Tracking System

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: Bug#844300: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

On 2016-11-22 13:44:16 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Thanks for these additional details. I currently think that this might > suffice to further track down the issue. So if the additional state > bundle is too much effort, we'll see how far we come with this. The bundle is very large (380 MB).

Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Control: reassign -1 aptitude Control: retitle -1 aptitude can put the package system in a broken state with different versions of a MultiArch package Control: severity -1 serious On 2016-11-22 09:10:01 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 04:27 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 aptitude Bug #844300 [nvidia-driver-libs] nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue Bug reassigned from package 'nvidia-driver-libs' to 'aptitude'. No longer marked as found in versions nvidia-graphics-drivers/367.57-2. Ignoring

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Vincent, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-11-22 09:10:01 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 04:27 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2016-11-22 00:37:14 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > In the end, you shouldn't have let aptitude remove the

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#843536: Bug#843536: Setting a package on hold resets the auto flag

Hi Yuri, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Setting a package in "iA" state on hold clears the automatic flag, but there's > no reason it should. The auto state should be preserved when putting a package > on hold, as forbid currently does. Thanks for the bug report. I can confirm this at least in the TUI

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#818919: aptitude runs wild

Processing control commands: > tag 818919 + unreproducible Bug #818919 [aptitude] aptitude markauto runs wild, if package does not exist Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 818919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818919 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#818919: Bug#818919: aptitude runs wild

Control: tag 818919 + unreproducible Hi Martin, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > 2016-03-22 13:37 zieg...@uni-freiburg.de: > >aptitude search "?description(1234)" > >shows the progress of a filterung process. So > >I waited 5 minutes to the expected output. > > > >aptitude markauto 1234

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#841227: Bug#841227: aptitude break after install a net pkg

Control: close -1 Hi Heliogabalo, sorry for the late reply. Both current aptitude developers were rather busy in the past months... Heliogabalo Santos Jugon wrote: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.7.4-2ubuntu2 > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers Please

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#841227: aptitude break after install a net pkg

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #841227 [aptitude] aptitude break after install a net pkg Marked Bug as done -- 841227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#845310: aptitude: Update>>"Loading cache" stuck (loop/wait forever) for buggy(?) repo

Processing control commands: > forcemerge 834790 -1 Bug #834790 [aptitude] aptitude hangs at "Loading cache" when unable to download package list Bug #838560 [aptitude] aptitude: "aptitude -u" hangs indefinitely at "Loading cache" if an APT repo results in a 404 (maybe APT 1.3 related) Bug

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#845310: Bug#845310: aptitude: Update>>"Loading cache" stuck (loop/wait forever) for buggy(?) repo

Control: forcemerge 834790 -1 Control: severity 834790 important Control: tags 834790 - moreinfo Hi Peter, Peter Gervai wrote: > When lists contain > > deb > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/AsamK:/RetroShare/Debian_8.0/ > / > > downloading the indexes goes well, but after

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: tagging 843536

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 843536 + confirmed Bug #843536 [aptitude] Setting a package on hold resets the auto flag Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 843536:

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #844300 [aptitude] aptitude can put the package system in a broken state with different versions of a MultiArch package Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 844300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844300 Debian Bug Tracking System

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

reassign -1 dpkg 1.18.15 (cutting down heavily on the text) On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:43:35PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > --\ Packages to be upgraded (17) […] > iuA nvidia-driver-libs367.57-1 > 367.57-2 […] > --\ Packages being removed because they

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#818919: marked as done (aptitude markauto runs wild, if package does not exist)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:01:49 +0100 with message-id <20161123010149.gb5...@sym.noone.org> and subject line Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#818919: aptitude runs wild has caused the Debian Bug report #818919, regarding aptitude markauto runs wild, if package does not exist to be marked as

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#844300: nvidia-driver-libs:amd64: upgrade failure due to dependency issue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844300 dpkg 1.18.15 Bug #844300 [aptitude] aptitude can put the package system in a broken state with different versions of a MultiArch package Bug reassigned from package 'aptitude' to 'dpkg'. Ignoring request to alter found versions