Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> aptitude uses the hostname of APT repository (e.g. "security.debian.org"
> to determine what is a security update and what isn't instead of using
> the repository metadata provided by apt's libraries.
JFTR: This was prompted by
https://bugs.launchpad
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.10-6
Severity: normal
Tags: confirmed upstream
aptitude uses the hostname of APT repository (e.g. "security.debian.org"
to determine what is a security update and what isn't instead of using
the repository metadata provided by apt's libraries.
>From
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.10-6
Hi,
aptitude (running inside GNU Screen) just segfaulted while browsing with
"cursor down" through the "Obsolete and locally installed packages"
list:
$ gdb -q aptitude-curses
/var/crash/0/23865-0-0-11-1522417552-c-cactus2--usr-bin-aptitude-curses.core
IIRC we discussed that already once in the past when $XDG_CACHE_HOME
got implemented and decided against it at least back then.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'
mends to stay consistent.
This should happen if --with-recommends and --no-new-installs are both
given on the commandline.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'
sn't make
sense?
> Shouldn't they be installed by default?
Yes, but this still doesn't answer the question how this can be
combined with safe-upgrade at all.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.d
e CLI interface of aptitude.
> Please see #892983 for further details.
… and ?suite() would be indeed a very nice addition. So thanks for the
patch (and patch template)!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :
can't do this yet. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486
neither of the two alternative versioned
dependencies are fulfilled, hence it tries to fulfill the first
alternative dependency. The remainder seems to be a "local optimum"
issue it doesn't find to escape itself in time. It probably will find
the right solution later if you continue to
that, they
won't get any farther — neither here nor anywhere else.
Regards, Axel (running Debian Unstable with sysvinit or openrc)
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B
aborting
This is https://bugs.debian.org/509100 ("aptitude: build-dep fails
when a virtual package is needed"): libgpgme11-dev is a virtual
package.
Hence merging.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | D
gt; E: Failed to execute:
> 'apt --simulate download php7.1-imap'
> E: The process or trying to execute it exited with status/errno: 100
So basically aptitude should just tell you that it would call 'apt
download php7.1-imap'?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Be
a well-known issue I'm quite sure that there exists a
_wishlist_ bug report for years. There was the 0.6.9 branch which had
this fixed, but it opened tons of other regressions and was hence was
dropped as a dead end.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.or
nt locations for that call look sane and normal and just simply
moving them around might break other things.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5
hese restrictions with the next upload.
I've allowed myself to retitle this bug report towards that issue
since the original one is a non-issue.
I've set the severity only to important since this so far had no
real-life impact. Feel free to bump the severity to serious iff this
caus
ted it):
→ apt-cache show wml | egrep '^(Package|Version|Architecture|$)'
Package: wml
Version: 2.4.1ds1-2
Architecture: all
Package: wml
Version: 2.0.12ds1-10+b2
Architecture: amd64
(That's wml in unstable/testing and experimental currently.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Bec
would also be interesting what the output of this command
is on your machine.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517
install quite a lot of packages unexpectedly.)
> Please fix the above error.
I currently see no error which needs to be fixed, especially no error
message. The only thing I see here is a potentially missing feature
and an otherwise perfectly working aptitude.
Thanks to Mattia for making me a
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.10-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
due to https://bugs.debian.org/884027 I've marked the upgrade for
marble-data as forbidden with "F" and then accepted the suggested 7
keeps with "!". Afterwards the marble-data upgrade was no more marked as
forbidden:
After pressing "U":
ered me enough that I even thought about documenting it in a
bug report.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD
Control: found -1 0.8.10-1
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> I just ran into #837366 with 0.8.4-1, hence reopening it:
>
> Writing extended state information 10[1]27840
> segmentation fault (core dumped) aptitude -u
Today I accidentially typed into the wrong wind
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Dominique,
Dominique Brazziel wrote:
> aptitude changelog hangs waiting on futex
Indeed, I can reproduce the issue here.
Thanks for the bug report!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian
get build-dep mutt" shows:
Also common with #509100.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-
, such cases are no bug in the
packaging tools, but either packages or the local system.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6
error message is emitted by the program aptitude, it
comes from apt's libraries' usage of GPG, so reassigning to apt, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4
ing about:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Sha1Removal
That's "Apt", not "Aptitude" in that link.
Reassigning accordingly.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Deb
too, but I
was too tired to properly check that suspicion before going to bed.
:-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E
tude, etc. without fiddling with hook configurations or
using dpkg to purge apprecommender.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' |
erivatives (Kali IIRC) or with 3rd party repositories.
So I wonder if its related to the repository format.
Does it happen for you with official Debian repositories or with 3rd
party repositories?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, ht
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Not sure if it's really the same problem as in Sven's #866974 case
> (which I can reproduce in the TUI and on the commandline) there was no
> hard exiting (I wouldn't call it crash, but that's nitpicking) due to
> a Ass
the same problem as in Sven's #866974 case
(which I can reproduce in the TUI and on the commandline) there was no
hard exiting (I wouldn't call it crash, but that's nitpicking) due to
a Assertion being not true. Hence not merging for the moment.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel B
lled, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
Would download/install/remove packages.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.d
bug report. For now, I leave it at RC.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 612
Hi Cesare,
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> On 29/05/2017 11:31, Axel Beckert wrote:
> >Before you press the corresponding menu entry, but after already
> >having selected it, aptitude will show the following long description
> >in the status line:
> >
> > Cancel all
s of this session
* Cancel all pending actions
or similar.
For now, what should do what you want is calling "aptitude keep-all"
on the commandline.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.6-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just ran into a corner case which causes a crash of aptitude:
→ env LANG=foobar aptitude changelog aptitude
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid
out removals (excessively so in this case).
I agree here, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
Dear mips64el Buildd Admins,
can you please giveback aptitude/0.8.6-1 on mips64el?
Axel Beckert wrote on 25. Jan. 2017:
> According to
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aptitude=mips64el=0.8.5-1=1485311229=0
> something (probably xsltproc) segfaulted while build
ge development happens. This is also
declared in the Vcs-Git header of the aptitude source package:
Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/aptitude/aptitude.git -b debian-sid
The master branch is meant for upstream development.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert &
ptitude from Git and does
not use Git HEAD then (like us developers).
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 1
T_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt push -a" manually.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-
ing against google-mock versions before 1.8.0.
This means that we probably should restrict the google-mock
build-dependency to ">= 1.8.0". Will take care of that.
> What could be done to work around this issue?
Probably installing a newer version of google-mock.
Reg
Axel Beckert wrote:
> can you please giveback aptitude/0.8.5-1 on mips64el?
Thanks!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5
on other architectures and
is architecture-independent).
Even though it's no more mentioned in the /topic of #debian-devel, I
assume that's of the recently shown up build problems on mips64el.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.or
gt; Unable to make a source version for version '0.8.4'
the Debian BTS thinks in Debian uploads, not in upstream versions.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'
might have helped you in the first place. I'll go over those
documentation bug reports in some calm hours, but probably not before
the Stretch release.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.c
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Will now try to get out of that mess. Will post it here, once I
> found a way out of this state.
"aptitude keep apt-build" on the commandline at least got me out of
the endless loop in the TUI.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Maintainer's opinion
Hi,
to reproduce https://bugs.debian.org/851814, I pressed L on apt-build in
aptitude's TUI. As expected the configuration of the reinstalled package
failed. So far no problem.
But afterwards, when I want
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
signature.asc
Description: D
, that does sound better.
> i think i will reinstall the system later. im currently backing up my
> homedirectory.
Probably the best thing, yes. I'll hence close this bug report with
this mail.
> thanks for the help.
You're welcome.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beck
was a stable/unstable mixup when writing the bug
report?
If not: Are there any traces of a file system corruption (e.g. in the
output of dmesg or so)?
What does "debsums -c apt libapt-inst1.5 libapt-pkg4.12" or "dpkg
--verify apt libapt-inst1.5 libapt-pkg4.12" say?
any chance to add the old behaviour as
optional feature/backwards compatibility flag (e.g. --immediately),
feel free to remove the wontfix tag. (Then again, there's an easy
workaround to get the old behaviour as shown above...)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debia
n.
Then go to the parent Recommends branch and mark the "Recommends" for
installation with "+", and voila: Two alternative and conflicting
packages are selected for installation despite one of them was already
selected.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debia
ipIndexes related
issues are gone now. Will later check on a much slower machine (an
EeePC 900).
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 148
at least in the TUI
(where it happens immediately).
I also checked older versions: This is a relatively new bug and it
doesn't happen in Jessie or Wheezy. So it likely has been introduced
with one of the 0.7.x or 0.8.x versions.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <
https://bugs.debian.org/838560) which is not yet solved. But we're
fully aware of it.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-11-22 12:36:32 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > In any case, if the dependencies are correct, the package system
> > > should never be put in a broken state.
> >
with apt or apt-get leads to the same issue? (If so, it's
clearly no issue in aptitude.)
Additionally it could be helpful to provide a state bundle (man
aptitude-create-state-bundle) of the situation, either before the
issue appears (if you can reproduce it) or directly after it has
happened. TIA!
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> The main reason is that ~A does (as most of aptitude's patterns)
> substring matching,
[…]
> * aptitude's ~A pattern matches substrings of the Archive value in the
> Release file.
Sven is of course right, and it's regular expression matching a
//aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s04s05.html#searchArchive
but I must admit, it's not perfect as it does not help with your question.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Devel
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 20
ot;forbid-version" in
aptitude due to an RC bug in the most recent version.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E6
db, but after that, any changes apt makes are
> no longer applied to aptitude.
>
> Is this not happening for you?
Seems not, no. But then again, I'm using aptitude most of the time and
apt only in a few percent of all cases.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Becke
titude seems to no longer read the
> autobit state from apt.
Thanks for all these details! Seems as if there are still some corner
cases where aptitude doesn't sync the autoinstalled bit properly --
changing an autoinstalled bit manually without any install/remove
action seems to such a case according to
ally, usually in aptitude's TUI.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B
?
I have a slight suspicion that aptitude and apt might refer to
different architectures of gobject-introspection in this case (in
which both might be correct, just not displaying the expected or
multiple packages).
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.o
days they do.
> or is aptitude tracking this information on its own?
It did it before apt did and hence used its own database in the past.
But that was fixed IIRC years ago.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :
ot;) might be the same issue or at least related.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-|
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1+b1
Hi,
I can reproducible make aptitude crash with a segmentation fault if I
press "b" during (or maybe shortly before) the package download. I also
tried a few other keys like e.g. "n" or "/". Also crashes. Even pressing
"q" crashes.
Two backtraces, both
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> As every day, I ran "aptitude -u". But for one or two days (not sure if
> before or after the APT 1.3 final upload), all Opera APT repos gave a
> 404. (They no more do, so I can't reproduce it anymore with these repos,
> but will late
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: normal
As every day, I ran "aptitude -u". But for one or two days (not sure if
before or after the APT 1.3 final upload), all Opera APT repos gave a
404. (They no more do, so I can't reproduce it anymore with these repos,
but will later try to get a
TUI interactively
and /root/.cache/aptitude/ may also contain some files.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329
Not sure where you've read that the
transition should be _after_ Debian 9 is released. I read it as if the
plan was to transition _before_ the freeze for Debian 9 is started.
And hence it looks perfectly fine to me that the bug is marked as
done.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beck
hat like security updates and
give new upstream versions a new foldable branch in the TUI. While I'd
use that, I think such a bold (sic!) distinction should be made
optional. (I also wonder if that could be established by pure
configuration changes. But then again IIRC the preview tab is not that
issue?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D
. So thanks for having already included a patch!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1
Hi Manuel,
after an aptitude "Performing actions" run I typed "q" and pressed
enter.
While the "Updating … and quitting" screen was shown I already started
to type "update-alternatives --config" and aptitude segfaulted with the
following backtraces:
warning:
Hi David,
> Closing as not-a-bug for the aptitude maintainers with my libapt hat on
> as it is my 'fault' and they couldn't change anything about it even if
> they wanted to.
Thanks! Much appreciated!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debia
ur sources.list, too?
If so, the bug might be that aptitude considers any version essential
even if only a non-candidate version is marked as essential.
Could you please check that?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org
so probably
a non-comparable case.
But I agree, that this shouldn't happen on a safe-upgrade.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA9
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Assuming that you don't want to switch back to the previous command
> > line behavior please at least consider providing an option
> > (APT::Get::...)
>
> You probably meant "Aptitude::…".
>
> I agree that providing s
h non-zero
value and errors which were not represented in the exit code. So
relying on such inconsistent behaviour is IMHO even dangerous.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org
y impact a first-time install if a bad mirror
> is chosen.
I disagree here. As far as I know, aptitude was never used inside the
d-i and is not even installed by default anymore. Hence removing that
tag.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://pe
gned columns. Maybe some different options being set via
configuration files?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9
dth using `-w` in every `aptitude search ... | less`,
> especially when it's a significant deviation from previous behaviour.
I agree here, but I'm still not sure what's the best way to handle
this case.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://pe
i - Marathi environment
task-marathi-desktop - Marathi desktop
So unless you want to change aptitude's default, I don't see any bug
here and would like to close this bug report again.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
us to start aptitude in exactly the
same environment.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-|
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 20
ases but works for me as commandline alias well enough for
years now.)
We might consider adding such a branch to aptitude's TUI, but at least
the implementation above is rather slow, so unless we find a more
efficient pattern or some other more direct way, I'd not add that. (So
Manuel's "
h of the New Packages list. Now you press "f" and one
machine already forgot the New Packages list while the other still
needs you to press "". But if you press "" on both, the
Testing machine opens one level of the Upgradable Packages list
instead.
Does this h
it:
I have aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts always on and he has it always
off. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2F
for me, yes.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C
open. Can't
imagine how this should be possible.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F06
in the 4.6 kernel's
postinst and no more sports 4.5 kernel packages in
APT::NeverAutoRemove. Hence it will be allowed to consider these
packages to be removed at the next aptitude run while it wasn't in the
previous one.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@d
>probably changes more often than the negation character).
> >>
> >>I can take care of that.
[…]
> >Please do, and add the sort criteria as well.
>
> Any chance of addressing this soon?
Thanks for the reminder, but probably not, at least not this weekend.
ution is simple anyway, just adding the extra space, or creating
> aliases if the same mistakes happen too often, etc.
Or switching to zsh. ;-)
SCNR, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org
Hi Albrecht,
Albrecht Herzog wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:49:53AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Hi Albert,
Sorry for misspelling of your name in my previous mail.
> > > I've got it when using "Q"
>
> Of course I did
>
> > Did you press &q
e narrow down the issue:
* Does it happen always or occassionally? Or did it happen only once
so far?
* Do you have a chance to reproduce it? If so, can you also try to
reproduce it in a Debian Unstable or Debian Testing environment? (A
chroot or VM should suffice.)
Regards, Axel
--
mit", then enter "!~M" as filter.
The commandline version needs the additional "~i" to limit the output
to installed packages while this is not necessary in the TUI as that's
one of the grouping properties.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert &l
1 - 100 of 393 matches
Mail list logo
