Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-12-11 Thread Polina Goltsman
Dear Nicolas, Thank you very much for the explanation, I have however two questions regarding your comments: 1) why is the explanation about why are parameters unspecified not present in the document? 2) in this case, I assume that the remark about "asymmetric link scenario evaluates an AQ

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-09.txt

2015-12-11 Thread Kuhn Nicolas
Dear Polina, all, Thank you for your email and I understand your concerns. I will provide more detail answer below for each of your points, but I would like first to clarify a general issue. The scope of this document is to present how to assess the performance of AQMs - without focusing on a