Re: [aqm] Experimental vs informational vs standards track

2016-02-05 Thread Polina Goltsman
On 02/05/2016 03:18 AM, Dave Täht wrote: Pie itself is proposed as standards track, despite the lack of field data, a 15 page criticism from bob briscoe of the public implementation, and other open issues like that. if "the public implementation" refers to Linux kernel module sch_pie, then it is

Re: [aqm] Experimental vs informational vs standards track

2016-02-05 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Wesley Eddy writes: > IMHO, Standards Track carries more weight to say that there are no > sharp corners, and the IETF is pretty sure this works well. > Experimental is more cautious saying this looks pretty useful, and you > should consider trying it out, but it might have some rough edges > (e.