Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benoit, -- DISCUSS: -- Hopefully an easy DISCUSS. 3. The algorithms that the IETF recommends SHOULD NOT require operational (especially

Re: [aqm] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with COMMENT)

Pete, Good catch! Authors doc shepherd: Did the author sign anything? If not, we need the pre-5378 boiler plate. Thanks, Martin Am 19.02.15 um 05:51 schrieb Pete Resnick: Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: No Objection When

[aqm] Martin Stiemerling's Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with COMMENT)

Martin Stiemerling has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...

. Cool thanks! Martin Richard Scheffenegger -Original Message- From: aqm [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling Sent: Mittwoch, 12. November 2014 13:47 To: aqm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE... [writing not as AD, but as random IETF