Re: [aqm] PIE (and CoDel) drafts: proposed standard vs informational?

2015-04-30 Thread Nicolas Kuhn
On 29 Apr 2015, at 18:42, Bob Briscoe bob.bris...@bt.com mailto:bob.bris...@bt.com wrote: Richard, Wes, 1) The AQM charter says: Dec 2014 - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard I volunteered to do a thorough review of the PIE draft,

Re: [aqm] PIE (and CoDel) drafts: proposed standard vs informational?

2015-04-30 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 4/29/2015 12:42 PM, Bob Briscoe wrote: Richard, Wes, 1) The AQM charter says: Dec 2014 - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Hi Bob, thanks for raising this, since it probably requires some clarification and discussion. I thought we'd

[aqm] PIE (and CoDel) drafts: proposed standard vs informational?

2015-04-29 Thread Bob Briscoe
Richard, Wes, 1) The AQM charter says: Dec 2014 - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard I volunteered to do a thorough review of the PIE draft, which I'm just writing up. One of the problems is that it says 'Proposed Standard' at the top, but it's

Re: [aqm] PIE (and CoDel) drafts: proposed standard vs informational?

2015-04-29 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Bob Briscoe bob.bris...@bt.com wrote: I volunteered to do a thorough review of the PIE draft, which I'm just writing up. One of the problems is that it says 'Proposed Standard' at the top, but it's written in an informational style. There is no normative