Sorry I haven’t had a chance to comment on this until now. Also, I’m not on
the bloat list, but you may copy any responses to me there, if you wish.
I was thinking perhaps another approach to spreading the word could be
presenting talks at conferences aimed at CIOs and CTOs. They are
Hi Dave,
On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I let the data take me where it may. I (not) always have, but reformed
about 15 years ago. [1] I hope that you and your students also, do
some experiments on the successors to PI and RED and DRR - and also
follow
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Vishal Misra mi...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your email. A few quick points:
- I have actually sent a note already to someone on the Cisco PIE team
about the error in the IETF IPR filing and am sure they will get it
corrected. You have
: Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
I think a combination of PI/PIE/fq_codel with ECN would enable us
a) be less dependent of the physical amount of buffering that is
implemented on the intermediate devices
b) allow us to use buffering for what it is meant to do - ride out
The correct Cisco IPR is http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2540/.
Vishal has done pioneering work in TCP modeling and in bringing in the
classical PI controller into the AQM space. I have certainly learned a lot
from him. We referenced their paper in our draft and paper, we even
mentioned his name
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Rong Pan (ropan) ro...@cisco.com wrote:
The correct Cisco IPR is http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2540/.
Thank you very much for the pointer to the correct IPR filing.
I apologize for being grumpy.
--
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, KK wrote:
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 01:01:19 -0800
From: KK k...@cs.ucr.edu
To: Vishal Misra mi...@cs.columbia.edu, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com
Cc: aqm@ietf.org aqm@ietf.org, bloat bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing
I
