Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Lee
Hi guys, This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware (although I suspect most of the optimisations will benefit other platforms too). After grabbing the latest code from CVS and fixing a few GCC 4/

Re: Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Young
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead > had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware > (although I suspect most of the optimisations will benefit other platforms

Re: Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Lee
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Chris Young wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > >> This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead >> had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware >> (although I suspect most of

Re: Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Ian Jeffray
On 31/07/2010 20:17, Chris Young wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > >> This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead >> had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware >> (although I suspect most of t

Re: Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Young
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > I doubt I'll be looking at ArcEm much more in the near future, so I'll > leave it to you to decide what (if anything) to do with these changes. I > haven't tried them on anything other than RISC OS, so it wouldn't surpr

Re: Optimising ArcEm for ARM hosts

2010-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Lee
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Chris Young wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: > >> I doubt I'll be looking at ArcEm much more in the near future, so I'll >> leave it to you to decide what (if anything) to do with these changes. I >> haven't tried them on anyt