[arch-dev-public] [signoff] grub 0.97-11

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Sorry for dropping off the radar lately, I am not sure what happened myself, but I have been away from all Arch work for two weeks. I corrected my grub -10 package and fixed the bugs mentioned by Andy. Please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] e2fsprogs 1.40.6-1

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Another version bump, still contains our fix to the configuration file that reenables a default inode size of 128. Please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] ntfs-3g 1.2216-1

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Version bump, please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] iptables 1.4.0-1

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration. Please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] iproute 2.6.24_rc7-1

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Update of iproute to the latest version, please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iproute 2.6.24_rc7-1

2008-02-26 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:12:33 +0100 Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of iproute to the latest version, please sign off. warning: iproute: local (070710-3) is newer than testing (2.6.24_rc7-1) There should be a force for this update. Daniel

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iproute 2.6.24_rc7-1

2008-02-26 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: Daniel Isenmann schrieb: warning: iproute: local (070710-3) is newer than testing (2.6.24_rc7-1) There should be a force for this update. done Please have a look at :

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] iptables 1.4.0-1

2008-02-26 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file to a more generic and correct configuration. Please sign off. Seems to be OK here. Signoff i686. -Dan

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] grub 0.97-11

2008-02-26 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:50:56 +0100 Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for dropping off the radar lately, I am not sure what happened myself, but I have been away from all Arch work for two weeks. I corrected my grub -10 package and fixed the bugs mentioned by Andy. Please sign

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] fakeroot 1.9.3-1

2008-02-26 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:24:26 +0200 schrieb Roman Kyrylych [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've built some packges with it that seem fine, so I'll signoff. Signed off (i686). somebody for x86_64?

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] grub 0.97-11

2008-02-26 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:50:56 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry for dropping off the radar lately, I am not sure what happened myself, but I have been away from all Arch work for two weeks. I corrected my grub -10 package and fixed the bugs mentioned by Andy. Please sign

Re: [arch-dev-public] Module blacklisting

2008-02-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Isenmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little bit confused right now. How can I blacklist modules. I have test both, MOD_BLACKLIST=(...) and MODULES=(!...), but both don't work. udev loads every module which can be loaded. For example I blacklist

Re: [arch-dev-public] Module blacklisting

2008-02-26 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Isenmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little bit confused right now. How can I blacklist modules. I have test both, MOD_BLACKLIST=(...) and MODULES=(!...), but both don't

Re: [arch-dev-public] Module blacklisting

2008-02-26 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Isenmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little bit confused right now. How can I blacklist modules.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Module blacklisting

2008-02-26 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Isenmann [EMAIL

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] fakeroot 1.9.3-1

2008-02-26 Thread Eric Belanger
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:24:26 +0200 schrieb Roman Kyrylych [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've built some packges with it that seem fine, so I'll signoff. Signed off (i686). somebody for x86_64? signing off x86_64 -- This message has been scanned for

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.24.3-1

2008-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Bumped to the .3 kernel, tested on both architectures, please sign off. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature