Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.24.4-1, support/atl2 2.0.4-1

2008-03-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
Simo Leone schrieb: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:34:35AM +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler_ wrote: - removed the aufs splice patch due to incompatibility with unionfs. This breaks aufs, but Simo promised to fix it (ping Simo) done. Thanks. Once I get an i686 signoff, I will move all

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glib2 2.16.1-1

2008-03-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
Jan de Groot schrieb: For GNOME 2.22, I need glib2 updated to 2.16.1, which is in testing for a while now. Please signoff for both architectures so GNOME can get moved too this week. I've used several applications which depend on glib2, no issues noticed. Signed off for x86_64.

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glib2 2.16.1-1

2008-03-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 12:37:10 schrieb Jan de Groot: Please signoff for both architectures signoff for both -- archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.24.4-1, support/atl2 2.0.4-1

2008-03-30 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 11:59:51 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: I will test i686 later. signoff for i686, too. -- archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] licenses: GPL permutations

2008-03-30 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2008/3/30, Paul Mattal [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What is the right way to list all the various contortions you can now have of GPL in the license array? There's: GPL - any version of GPL GPL2 - only version 2 GPL2+ - version 2 or later GPL3 - version 3 only GPL3+ - version 3 or later

Re: [arch-dev-public] licenses: GPL permutations

2008-03-30 Thread Paul Mattal
Roman Kyrylych wrote: This issue was discussed in past (I'm lazy to search for exact thread(s), sorry). The current scheme is: GPL - GPLv2 or, at your opinion, any later version GPL2 - GPL2 only (e.g. Linux kernel) GPL3 - GPL3 or, at your opinion, any later version I don't know of a single

Re: [arch-dev-public] licenses: GPL permutations

2008-03-30 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 10:24 -0400, Paul Mattal wrote: Roman Kyrylych wrote: This issue was discussed in past (I'm lazy to search for exact thread(s), sorry). The current scheme is: GPL - GPLv2 or, at your opinion, any later version GPL2 - GPL2 only (e.g. Linux kernel) GPL3 - GPL3 or,

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.24.4-1, support/atl2 2.0.4-1

2008-03-30 Thread Dan McGee
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Pierre Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, 30. März 2008 11:59:51 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: I will test i686 later. signoff for i686, too. Another signoff for i686 (I know its already in core), but I also tested atl2 and we are good to go there.

[arch-dev-public] Imagemagick rebuild in [testing]

2008-03-30 Thread Eric Belanger
Hi, I just uploaded an imagemagick package in testing that will require a rebuilt of the apps that links to its libs because the libraries names have changed. From imagemagick ChangeLog: * New Unix/Linux refactoring (should be transparent since changes are reflected in Magick-config

Re: [arch-dev-public] Imagemagick rebuild in [testing]

2008-03-30 Thread Travis Willard
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Eric Belanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: might be worth it to to that for future rebuilds. If someone with mysql access would do a todo list for the above, I'll appreciate. I could always do some of these rebuilds if some of you are overwhelmed by work. TODO