Hi all,
I'm on vacation for the next three weeks (starting from now + a few hours).
Perhaps one of you guys (devs/TUs) can take care of some things:
- move dhcpcd to [core] when it has the required i686 signoffs
- upgrade emesene to some unofficial version they have around
(microsoft changed the
On 11/12/2011 01:59 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
> So far the only solution is to download
On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
locally using gpg --det
On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
>>> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
>>> b
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
>> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
>> back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
>
>
On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
> back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
Did something change WRT this workflow now? I'm getting
sign
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
If you have no extra notes regarding the package, you don't need to
send these emails anymore.
Thanks.
-Dan
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Warning : the repository multilib does not exist in /srv/abs/rsync/any
===
= Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community,multilib =
===
Performing integrity checks...
==> parsing pkg
= Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community =
Performing integrity checks...
==> parsing pkgbuilds
==> parsing db files
==> checking mismatches
==> checking archs
==> checking dependencies
==> che
Latest LTS kernel is in testing,
Attention:
- This version uses the /lib/modules/extramodules-2.6.32-lts for self
compiled modules
- uname -r now reports the real kernel version, like the 3.x series
does
please signoff for both arches
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 1 known bad package
* 2 packages not accepting signoffs
* 25 fully signed off packages
* 102 packages missing signoffs
* 20 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
13 matches
Mail list logo