On 2 January 2012 21:20, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
2 packages I did not rebuild yet: kdeutils-ark, hydrogen.
kdeutils-ark: @andrea, you did a version bump on the PKGBUILD in SVN, but
never released this? Was there something you were waiting on? I didn't
want to push this without
On 3 January 2012 09:08, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
I'm on it right now.
I've to bump the pkgrel in kdeutils/repos/extra-{i686,x86_64},
kdeutils-ark/kde-unstable/trunk is for the kde-unstable version.
Sorry I written too fast, I mean staging-{i686,x86_64} here.
--
Andrea
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 1 known bad package
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 15 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
On 3 January 2012 04:20, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
hydrogen: @ray: I'm getting build errors from scons in the package
function, and I'm not sure where to go with them. I figured you might
know how to get around this.
Thanks for the heads-up, will take a look.
--
GPG/PGP ID:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate
we will have [extra] fully signed by mid 2014...
Allan
On 01/03/2012 02:25 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate
we will have [extra]
Am 03.01.2012 13:27, schrieb Ionut Biru:
On 01/03/2012 02:25 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 30.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Rémy Oudompheng:
I just wrote a small proof of concept for remote PGP signing.
It is written in Go (using the weekly snapshot, not the
r60 release), and is hosted at:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that
On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December,
around 20 to 30 packages
On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not
yet signed?
There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are
12 matches
Mail list logo
