Re: [arch-dev-public] kmod-3 in [testing]

2012-01-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I've just dropped kmod-3 into testing as a replacement for >> module-init-tools. This is still a young project, but it has a lot of >> support from active people, and I (as wel

Re: [arch-dev-public] kmod-3 in [testing]

2012-01-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > Hey all, > > I've just dropped kmod-3 into testing as a replacement for > module-init-tools. This is still a young project, but it has a lot of > support from active people, and I (as well as Tom) have been working > closely with upstream to fl

[arch-dev-public] kmod-3 in [testing]

2012-01-05 Thread Dave Reisner
Hey all, I've just dropped kmod-3 into testing as a replacement for module-init-tools. This is still a young project, but it has a lot of support from active people, and I (as well as Tom) have been working closely with upstream to flesh out and fix bugs. For the most part, you should not notice

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] linux-3.2-1

2012-01-05 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, please signoff 3.2 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-01-05 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 17 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 9 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: