[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2012-01-30 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 3 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note:

Re: [arch-dev-public] Keeping stuff in /bin, /lib, /sbin

2012-01-30 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Allan, Thanks for bringing this up. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Moving these out of /{s,}bin would make it a lot easier if _ONE DAY_ we do decide to merge /bin to /usr/bin.  And I mean _A LOT_ easier... Making changes like that is a real

Re: [arch-dev-public] the big rebuild - libpng/libtiff

2012-01-30 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: Hi, i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild is going to be difficult. All previous warnings are now fatal and a lot of patching is involved. I managed to get all patches from gentoo here (thanks

Re: [arch-dev-public] Keeping stuff in /bin, /lib, /sbin

2012-01-30 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
On 2012/1/30 Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Hi Allan, Thanks for bringing this up. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Moving these out of /{s,}bin would make it a lot easier if _ONE DAY_ we do decide to merge /bin to /usr/bin.  And I mean _A LOT_

Re: [arch-dev-public] Keeping stuff in /bin, /lib, /sbin

2012-01-30 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012/1/30 Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: Hi Allan, Thanks for bringing this up. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Moving these out of /{s,}bin would make it a lot

Re: [arch-dev-public] the big rebuild - libpng/libtiff

2012-01-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 31/01/12 04:43, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: Hi, i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild is going to be difficult. All previous warnings are now fatal and a lot of patching is involved. I managed to

Re: [arch-dev-public] the big rebuild - libpng/libtiff

2012-01-30 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/30/2012 10:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 31/01/12 04:43, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:33 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 01/18/2012 09:17 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: Hi, i cannot speak about libtiff but libpng 1.5 rebuild is going to be difficult. All previous warnings are now fatal and a lot

[arch-dev-public] the big rebuild - libpng/libtiff in testing

2012-01-30 Thread Ionut Biru
Here are couples of instructions about dealing with broken packages. As usually, fully update your system before reporting bugs and don't forget about enabling community-testing along with multilib-testing(if necessary) What to do when one of your favorite application returns: libpng14.so.14: