On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit :
Hello,
Version 5.2 of lua is out since December 2011 [1] and last update
since June 2012.
I suggest[2] to update our current lua package to 5.2.1 and
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit :
Hello,
Version 5.2 of lua is out since December 2011 [1] and last update
Le 2012-09-18 17:54, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit :
Hello,
Version 5.2 of lua
On 19/09/12 07:54, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Sébastien Luttringer se...@seblu.net
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org wrote:
Le 2012-09-13 16:19, Sébastien Luttringer a écrit :
Hello,
Version 5.2 of lua is
Hi,
The recent lua-5.2 thread and also python-3 have highlighted the need
for us to really have a policy for how we deal with providing two
different versions of a language interpreter in the repos. This is
particularly important when there is a period of time where we want to
supply the newer
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
The recent lua-5.2 thread and also python-3 have highlighted the need
for us to really have a policy for how we deal with providing two
different versions of a language interpreter in the repos. This is
6 matches
Mail list logo