[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-01-03 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 202 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 16 fully signed off packages * 217 packages missing signoffs * 20 packages older than 14 days

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, I'm guilty of python-pymongo, go and erlang-cl. I was unaware of the need to use communitypkg instead of extrapkg for community packages, until now, and will start using communitypkg instead. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 3 January 2013 14:53, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm guilty of python-pymongo, go and erlang-cl. I was unaware of the need to use communitypkg instead of extrapkg for community packages, until now, and will start using communitypkg instead. That doesn't make much

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, That doesn't make much sense to me. I mean, how have you been maintaining packages so far without using communitypkg? Sorry, I was a bit too quick there. I have been using communitypkg all along. I confused it with extra-i686-build and extra-x86_64-build, which I do use for community

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 3 January 2013 15:09, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, That doesn't make much sense to me. I mean, how have you been maintaining packages so far without using communitypkg? Sorry, I was a bit too quick there. I have been using communitypkg all along. I confused it with

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi again, 2013/1/3 Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com: On 3 January 2013 15:09, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: That does make more sense; thanks for clearing that up. :) Thanks for clearing that up yourself. :) But, now I'm confused, because I never used extrapkg at all on

[arch-dev-public] Adopt extra/stardict

2013-01-03 Thread Felix Yan
Hi, I'd like to adopt [extra]/stardict since I'm a user of it and it's an unneeded orphan in [extra], could anyone move it for me? Thanks! -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Allan McRae
On 04/01/13 00:42, Alexander Rødseth wrote: Hi again, 2013/1/3 Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com: On 3 January 2013 15:09, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: That does make more sense; thanks for clearing that up. :) Thanks for clearing that up yourself. :) But, now

Re: [arch-dev-public] Adopt extra/stardict

2013-01-03 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 3 January 2013 18:28, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to adopt [extra]/stardict since I'm a user of it and it's an unneeded orphan in [extra], could anyone move it for me? Just moved it, thanks.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, 2013/1/3 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: There were directories in the repos/ directory of SVN that should not be there. Dirrectories like extra-x86_64.Either than or directories name x86_64 which implied using archrelease manually and wrong... I must have created a directory named

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-01-04 01:08:20 +0100] Alexander Rødseth: Stupidity in response to creating two directories by mistake and svn commit messages like fix shit. Are you 12? Can you never just acknowledge your mistakes and move on? This list is not to discuss proper use of the word stupidity; it's to get

Re: [arch-dev-public] Fix SVN commit mistakes

2013-01-03 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 4 January 2013 08:08, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 2013/1/3 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: There were directories in the repos/ directory of SVN that should not be there. Dirrectories like extra-x86_64.Either than or directories name x86_64 which implied