Well done narrowing the issue down. I haven't had the chance to compare the
assembly output yet, but does it work if you compile with
-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations? Ref:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Back-branches-vs-gcc-4-8-0-td5750997.html
- Alexander / xyproto
Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:45:38 +0200
schrieb Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com:
Well done narrowing the issue down. I haven't had the chance to
compare the assembly output yet, but does it work if you compile with
-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations? Ref:
Uploaded tarballs with gcc47 and 48 with -O0 and -save-temps:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8HSjV2qdYV1VXhmdnlxc29RZDQ/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8HSjV2qdYV1aE80NWh4S1Yzdlk/edit?usp=sharing
Feel free to run meld over .s files.
-Andy
signature.asc
Description: PGP
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 7 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 4 fully signed off packages
* 78 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
I've built libdrm now with CLANG compiler and so far also no problems.
Clean dmesg, no hangs and no glitches over Firefox tabs.
I suggest to push a fixed package built with clang to testing and
report this one to gcc
On 13/07/13 17:40, Andreas Radke wrote:
Uploaded tarballs with gcc47 and 48 with -O0 and -save-temps:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8HSjV2qdYV1VXhmdnlxc29RZDQ/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8HSjV2qdYV1aE80NWh4S1Yzdlk/edit?usp=sharing
Feel free to run meld over .s
6 matches
Mail list logo
