On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2015-10-17 21:02:00 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer:
> > Q: We will support old packages?
> > A: No. Nothing change. We already have to check when people report bugs
> > they upgraded their system to the last version.
>
> I note that we provide
[2015-10-17 21:02:00 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer:
> Q: We will support old packages?
> A: No. Nothing change. We already have to check when people report bugs
> they upgraded their system to the last version.
I note that we provide aur.archlinux.org as a service to the community,
but with a big wa
[2015-10-17 21:02:00 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer:
> More than one year ago[1] we started to discuss making the Arch
> Rollback Machine more official. There were pros and cons and I would
> give us the opportunity to move forward.
I think this is great. You've now been running that project unoffici
On 18/10/15 05:02, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> ARM was renamed to Archlinux Archive,
Can you at least write the name of our distribution correctly? It has
two words, not one.
A
I like that project. However, why would we need a new server? Can't we use
the space and bandwidth of an existing host? I'm not too knowledgeable
about our current servers so maybe Florian could shed some light on that.
The script seems fairly manageable and you already provide systemd stuff
and e
Hello,
More than one year ago[1] we started to discuss making the Arch
Rollback Machine more official. There were pros and cons and I would
give us the opportunity to move forward.
ARM was renamed to Archlinux Archive, following suggestions made
earlier. The ALA acronym is now preferred to avoid
On 17 October 2015 at 20:24, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> [extra] is where devs push their packages and maintain them. Likewise
> with [community] and TUs. Nothing more.
>
> I don't really care where agetpkg should land; both [extra] and
> [community] are official repositories and they offer the
On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 13:08 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> Sébastien,
>
> is there any reason why agetpkg landed directly in [extra]? Your
> mirror
> isn't hosted as an official Arch project so far, despite our previous
> discussions on IRC. I don't mind its presence in [community], but
> [
Sébastien,
is there any reason why agetpkg landed directly in [extra]? Your mirror
isn't hosted as an official Arch project so far, despite our previous
discussions on IRC. I don't mind its presence in [community], but
[extra] is definitely too much for now.
Bartłomiej
signature.asc
Description:
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 5 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 7 fully signed off packages
* 26 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
(Note: t
10 matches
Mail list logo