On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 15:58:40, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I am not sure these serve any purpose. The maintainer line duplicates
> information available from the archweb or aur interfaces and could
> also be outdated. The contributor lines are mostly redundant with svn
> or
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 at 13:05:50, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> # Transparency report May 2020
This is a great idea, thank you so much for all the work that went into
writing this!
> ### GitLab
>
> We're in the process of switching our Git hosting from our custom cgit
> instance to
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 17:38:33, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 5/17/20 4:37 PM, Lukas Fleischer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Email addresses of aurweb accounts have to be confirmed (and accounts
> > without verified email addresses are not usable and can
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 14:39:25, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-dev-public wrote:
> As some of you know, we've been toying with two ideas for a while:
> Arch-wide centralized user management as well as using GitLab to
> consolidate some of our current services. The overall goal is manifold.
> In no
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 22:13:02, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> # Planet Arch Linux migration
>
> The software behind planet.archlinux.org was implemented in Python 2 and
> no longer maintained upstream. This functionality has now been
s/no/is no/
> implemented in archlinux.org's archweb backend
I was just informed by a user that 3.10 has been released. Since most
packages had not yet been rebuilt, I decided to put 3.10 in [staging]
and restart the process.
Any packages that have been built against 3.9 will have to be rebuilt
again.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 12:53:33, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Since there's some overlap with the boost rebuild, we should probably
> wait until boost leaves [staging]. I temporarily removed protobuf from
> [staging] just to be safe.
protobuf 3.9.2 is back in [staging]. Please start rebuilding!
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 at 12:27:45, Arch Website Notification wrote:
> Todo list information:
> Name: protobuf 3.9 rebuild
> URL: https://www.archlinux.org/todo/protobuf-39-rebuild/
> Creator: Lukas Fleischer
> Description:
> Please rebuild affected packages and move them to
>
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 18:47:44, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> So what can we do here? I am a big fan of Gentoos Newsletter feature[1].
> It would be super awesome if we would have a tool such like `archnews
> ` to retrieve NEWS about a certain package from an
> endpoint. This
Dear Christian,
Thank you for your email.
On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 at 19:08:30, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> inspired by the last thread about moving proprietary software to
> community, our general problem of getting more people involved in Arch
> Linux and the (for me) chaotic
On Wed, 30 May 2018 at 17:18:07, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> So far we haven't ever cleaned up the archive
> (https://archive.archlinux.org/), but it's getting too big and I don't
> think we have any use for packages from years ago.
>
> Next week I will remove the years 2013, 2014
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 at 10:54:37, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Please look at both lists and adopt what your packages are using or
> you're personally interested in. I will drop whatever makes sense in
> January.
> [...]
Thanks for initiating another (long overdue) cleanup
12 matches
Mail list logo
