On 01.02.2017 20:08, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> No hard feelings from this side of the room. Have we ever considered
> using software like mirrorbrain so users could just hit
> ${country_code}.mirrors.archlinux.org to get the packages?
I don't feel like adding a single point of failure is a
No hard feelings from this side of the room. Have we ever considered
using software like mirrorbrain so users could just hit
${country_code}.mirrors.archlinux.org to get the packages?
Bartłomiej
Em janeiro 30, 2017 19:13 Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public escreveu:
My plan is to keep this because I just remove the sorting by score. The
score will still be used to filter mirrors which have a very high one
(currently >100). Such mirrors are either very, very slow or out of
date. Using the
On 30.01.2017 21:57, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Idea sounds good to me, don't forget that you can also 'generate a
> mirrorlist' here, so you might want to remove the 'use mirror status'
> option there too. (or was that not part of the plan?) [1]
>
> [1] https://www.archlinux.org/mirrorlist/
My
On 01/30/17 at 08:39pm, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just received a report from a mirror admin about some very heavy
> traffic. After some investigation it appears that the traffic towards
> his mirror started to rise around the beginning of the new year when we
>
Hi,
I've just received a report from a mirror admin about some very heavy
traffic. After some investigation it appears that the traffic towards
his mirror started to rise around the beginning of the new year when we
disabled the mirror checker on gerolde. Since we now only have a mirror
checker
6 matches
Mail list logo
