On Jan 31, 2008 12:16 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
> >>
> >> I'd like to get these into core as soon as possible
> >>
> >
> > Got enough i686 signoffs - any x86_64 guys?
> >
>
> No issues here.
Ok, I've tested on both my x86_64 and i686 machines. Moving to
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>>
>> I'd like to get these into core as soon as possible
>>
>
> Got enough i686 signoffs - any x86_64 guys?
>
No issues here.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Jan 30, 2008 12:26 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files I
> bumped both the package and the md5sum on profile in order to get
> around edge cases with
2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 30, 2008 8:33 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As it is in /etc, it is a configuration file. As 99% of the users don't
> > change it, 99%
> > of those users won't see a .pacnew file whenever we change the file. For
> > the 1%
>
Namens Dan McGee
> > > Verzonden: woensdag 30 januari 2008 15:08
> > > Aan: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development
> > > Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.033-2 and
> > > filesystem 2007.11-6
> > >
> > > >
> > &g
iling list for ArchLinux development
> > Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.033-2 and
> > filesystem 2007.11-6
> >
> > >
> > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2008-January/016696.html
> > > Should we consider /etc/issue not being
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:arch-dev-public-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dan McGee
> Verzonden: woensdag 30 januari 2008 15:08
> Aan: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development
> Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.033-
2008/1/30, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 30, 2008 3:59 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> > > problems due to an edge case with the generation of pa
On Jan 30, 2008 9:08 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2008 3:59 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> > > problems due to an edge case wit
On Jan 30, 2008 3:59 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> > problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files I
> > bumped both the package and the md
2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files I
> bumped both the package and the md5sum on profile in order to get
> around edge cases with no pacnew files
>
>
These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files I
bumped both the package and the md5sum on profile in order to get
around edge cases with no pacnew files
bash was a version bump too mainly to move the man pages
12 matches
Mail list logo
