On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue
Am Montag, 14. April 2008 18:17:16 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> Still need at least another x86_64 signoff, but I'd like more than
> that just to be safe.
signoff for both arches. tested ssh and sshd.
--
archlinux.de
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Works as usual. Signed off (i686).
Moved the discussion of .pacnew issue to pacman-dev.
Still need at least another x86_64 signoff, but I'd like more than
that just to be safe.
ssh working fine (I use it all the time), and I received several GB of
data with sshd and
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Roman Kyrylych
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > 2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Ap
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New and improved ssh
> >
> > I haven't been able to
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > New and improved ssh
> > >
> > > I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstre
2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New and improved ssh
> >
> > I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstream change log (busy
> > with devtools/dbscripts changes), but I know this has some large
>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm..
> pacman created /etc/ssh/sshd_config.pacnew, but I didn't modify
> sshd_config, so I wonder why pacman didn't just overwrite it. :-/
>
Could you keep your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file, downgrade openssh to
the ol
2008/4/9, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New and improved ssh
> >
> > I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstream change log (busy
> > with devtools/dbscripts changes), but I know this has some large
>
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New and improved ssh
>
> I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstream change log (busy
> with devtools/dbscripts changes), but I know this has some large
> security fixes, and also contains the new-fangled chroot
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin schrieb:
>
>
> > Should be in testing for both arches
> >
>
> BTW, there is no x86_64 package.
Uploaded. Thanks for pointing that out
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Should be in testing for both arches
BTW, there is no x86_64 package.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
New and improved ssh
I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstream change log (busy
with devtools/dbscripts changes), but I know this has some large
security fixes, and also contains the new-fangled chroot ability.
That's right, sshd should not have the ability to c
New and improved ssh
I haven't been able to find a comprehensive upstream change log (busy
with devtools/dbscripts changes), but I know this has some large
security fixes, and also contains the new-fangled chroot ability.
That's right, sshd should not have the ability to chroot users built
in. I k
14 matches
Mail list logo
