Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 04:21:21 schrieb Dan McGee: Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. signoff (both). I have tested pacman itself and makepkg; no problems so far. -- archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 10 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: | Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. | | I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. singing in the rain for x86_64 looks great, - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ °° °

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Dan McGee schrieb: Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. Signoff for both, upgrade path seems fine. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 10, 2008 7:26 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan McGee schrieb: Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. Signoff for both, upgrade path seems fine. Signed off i686, didn't fully test on x86_64 (but Dan you

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-09 Thread Eric Belanger
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote: On Jan 9, 2008 10:21 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. NOTE: this is a signoff email only, and deals with the *packaging* and not the