On 18/03/2019 09.18, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
> [2019-03-18 08:39:45 +0100] Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public:
>> I asked Bruno to start another round as previous thread is way too long
>> for people who missed the party to catch up.
>
> So some of us have taken the time
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:49:16 +0100
Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On March 18, 2019 8:39:45 AM GMT+01:00, "Bartłomiej Piotrowski via
> arch-dev-public" wrote:
> >The previous discussion doesn't answer (or even if it does, I don't
> >care
> >to re-read it at this point) if the idea
[2019-03-18 08:39:45 +0100] Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public:
> I asked Bruno to start another round as previous thread is way too long
> for people who missed the party to catch up.
So some of us have taken the time to discuss this issue just a month ago
but because it's too much to
On March 18, 2019 8:39:45 AM GMT+01:00, "Bartłomiej Piotrowski via
arch-dev-public" wrote:
>The previous discussion doesn't answer (or even if it does, I don't
>care
>to re-read it at this point) if the idea behind the new metapackage is
>to be implicit dependency of all packages or just
On 17/03/2019 23.13, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
> [2019-03-17 19:07:23 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
>> This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal base
>> system”.
>
> Creating a new thread removed from the discussion we had a month ago
> just makes
[2019-03-17 23:29:12 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
> I was satisfied with the consensus we reached, but when I asked on IRC
> how I should revive the thread so that we move on with that proposal to
> an actual implementation, I faced concerns about this proposal from
> several persons.
On March 17, 2019 11:13:31 PM GMT+01:00, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public
wrote:
>[2019-03-17 19:07:23 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
>> This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal
>base
>> system”.
>
>Creating a new thread removed from the discussion we had a
Le 17/03/2019 à 23:13, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public a écrit :
> [2019-03-17 19:07:23 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
>> This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal base
>> system”.
> Creating a new thread removed from the discussion we had a month ago
> just
[2019-03-17 19:07:23 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public:
> This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal base
> system”.
Creating a new thread removed from the discussion we had a month ago
just makes it so much harder for all of us to remember what everyone's
arguments
Hi there,
This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal base
system”.
# Reminder of the starting statement
> There is no strict definition of what a minimal Arch Linux system
installation must contain. However in reality we mostly don’t add any
packages that are in the base
10 matches
Mail list logo
