Am 23.01.2013 20:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer:
Hello,
I've cleaned all packages where I maintain rc scripts. Lukas J. has
moved the legacy to a community[1] package[2].
FYI for Lukas: I removed initscripts support from openvpn, the scripts
are still in SVN.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 November 2012 16:03, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
from their package would notify
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the
Le 2012-11-08 10:03, Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
It would be
On 8 November 2012 16:03, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 08:59, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky:
It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
from their package would notify me, so I can keep then in a rc-scripts
package as discussed previously
Good idea, +1.
To find deleted files that ends with .rc:
svn log -v | grep '^ *D.*/trunk/.*\.rc$'
D /fail2ban/trunk/fail2ban.rc
D /multipath-tools/trunk/multipathd.rc
D /virtualbox/trunk/vbox-service.rc
D /oidentd/trunk/oidentd.rc
D /ufw/trunk/ufw.rc
D
As to forcibly removing all the rc scripts by a certain date, I guess
we could get back to that later once we see how things pan out? I'd be
fine with doing it, but don't see the urgency.
It would be great if maintainers who are going to drop the rc scripts
from their package would notify me,
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
As systemd is now the default init system, Arch Linux is receiving
minimal testing on sysvinit/initscripts systems. Due to a lack of
resources and interest, sysvinit/initscripts-specific bugs may now be
closed as WONT FIX.
We
Am Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:52:31 +0100
schrieb Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no:
Unless there are any objections, I'll put this up soon so I can start
closing bugs without feeling bad about it ;-)
-t
+1
-Andy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Andreas Radke andy...@archlinux.org wrote:
Unless there are any objections, I'll put this up soon so I can start
closing bugs without feeling bad about it ;-)
-t
+1
-Andy
Done.
-t
Hi all,
as systemd is now our default initsystem the current status of
initscripts is a little vague. The problem is not the initscripts
package itself but rc.d files and support in other packages. It is
unrealistic to think we can support two different init systems. Testing
on both systems is
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
* Publish an announcement with the said dates and a link to a migration
guide
* Support for initscripts can be dropped e.g. end of December. After
that packages may drop support; but not before.
* rc.d scripts and other
12 matches
Mail list logo
