Sorry for being late to the party.
On 2017-11-14 20:30:21 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> It seems to be time to move on, and Bugzilla is one of the more active and
> maintained bugtrackers out there. Used by several big projects such as
> Gnome, LLVM and Mozilla. One of the benefits of moving
On 11/16/17 at 02:01pm, Morten Linderud wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:30:21PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > [snip]
> > # Products
> >
> > * Arch packages (core/extra or split this up)
> > * Community packages (community)
> > * Pacman
> > * AURWeb
> > * Keyring
> > * Archweb (new)
> > *
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:30:21PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [snip]
> # Products
>
> * Arch packages (core/extra or split this up)
> * Community packages (community)
> * Pacman
> * AURWeb
> * Keyring
> * Archweb (new)
> * Arch VM / Docker images (new)
> * Release engineering
>
I think co
Em novembro 15, 2017 6:07 Lukas Fleischer escreveu:
However, we should make sure that the old Flyspray URLs still work (and
redirect to the Flyspray archive).
Even though flyspray URL's are not really flyspray's and are more nginx's [0],
if there is no clash with bugzilla, I don't see any reaso
On 15.11.2017 09:07, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Generally speaking, I am in favor of setting up a fresh Bugzilla
> instance and not doing any sort of migration. The idea of switching to a
> new bug tracker came up at least four years ago and my feeling is that
> all this migration work is what was ho
On 11/15/17 at 09:07am, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 20:30:21, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > It's time to switch our to something which is maintained and can be
> > extended to
> > our wishes. Flyspray isn't actively maintained, has had several security
> > issues [1] [2].
> > [
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 at 20:30:21, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> It's time to switch our to something which is maintained and can be extended
> to
> our wishes. Flyspray isn't actively maintained, has had several security
> issues [1] [2].
> [...]
Great!
> # Migration
>
> There are several options
Em novembro 14, 2017 17:30 Jelle van der Waa escreveu:
It's time to switch our to something which is maintained and can be extended to
our wishes. Flyspray isn't actively maintained, has had several security issues
[1] [2].
Being the person responsible for writing our flyspray ansible's role a
On 2017-11-14 22:59, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 15/11/17 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>>> There are several options for migrating the bug history to Bugzilla and a
>>> few options are under
>>> debate. (input welcome)
>> As I said multiple times on IRC, I'm for starting from scratch. There
>>
On 15/11/17 07:34, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
>> There are several options for migrating the bug history to Bugzilla and a
>> few options are under
>> debate. (input welcome)
> As I said multiple times on IRC, I'm for starting from scratch. There
> are way too many inactive or/and incorrect bugs
[2017-11-14 22:11:02 +0100] Johannes Löthberg via arch-dev-public:
> My first reaction is that it'd be nice to not have a bunch of old cruft
> around,
For what it's worth: I completely agree.
My choice would be to start over with a clean bug tracker and not
migrate anything. Everyone who cares w
On 2017-11-14 20:30, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Used by several big projects such as Gnome, LLVM and Mozilla
GNOME will probably end up switching to Gitlab. (Not dismissing the fact
that bugzilla is rather popular choice.)
> # Migration
>
> There are several options for migrating the bug history
On 11/14/2017 02:30 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> There are several options for migrating the bug history to Bugzilla
> and a few options are under debate. (input welcome)
>
> * No migration at all
> * Migrate open bugs
> * Migrate open bugs and auto-closing them
> * Migrate all bugs
> * Migrate
Quoting Jelle van der Waa (2017-11-14 20:30:21)
> There are several options for migrating the bug history to Bugzilla and a few
> options are under
> debate. (input welcome)
>
> * No migration at all
> * Migrate open bugs
> * Migrate open bugs and auto-closing them
> * Migrate all bugs
> * Migrat
It's time to switch our to something which is maintained and can be extended to
our wishes. Flyspray isn't actively maintained, has had several security issues
[1] [2].
It seems to be time to move on, and Bugzilla is one of the more active and
maintained bugtrackers out there. Used by several big
15 matches
Mail list logo
