=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 12 fully signed off packages
* 53 packages missing signoffs
* 14 packages older than 14 days
On 26.11.2016 13:38, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Any opinion about this change? Who can post news about this on the website?
You should be able to add news here[1] at the top right. I don't use
openvpn so I don't care about this, but converging towards what upstream
does is generally a good idea.
Hey guys,
I've got a few concerns when moving arduino into community. Lately we
could solve most bugs, but those require some manual installation steps
that I want to explain here, and those possibly need additional
information on the front page:
Some (very old) arduino installations (somehow)
Hello everybody,
a new OpenVPN stable release is being prepared, namely version 2.4.0.
Currently we have 2.4_beta2. I think about making changes to our package that
require user intervention.
We shipped a systemd unit file before OpenVPN upstream had one. Upstream now
has unit files, but two
Christian Hesse on Sat, 2016/11/26 13:38:
> That could change with 2.4.0. Instead of openvpn@.service we would have
> openvpn-server@.service and openvpn-client@.service. Additionally the
> 'daemon' option is no longer allowed with the upstream units.
Oh, and another change...
On 2016-11-26 13:38, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> a new OpenVPN stable release is being prepared, namely version 2.4.0.
> Currently we have 2.4_beta2. I think about making changes to our package that
> require user intervention.
>
> We shipped a systemd unit file before OpenVPN
Bartłomiej Piotrowski on Sat, 2016/11/26 21:55:
> On 2016-11-26 13:38, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > a new OpenVPN stable release is being prepared, namely version 2.4.0.
> > Currently we have 2.4_beta2. I think about making changes to our package
On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 13:38 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
>
> Any opinion about this change? Who can post news about this on the website?
The switch from Type=forking to simple will break units which rely on proper
ordering of subnets added by that tunnel. That look as a regression to me.
I'm
8 matches
Mail list logo