On 25/10/12 10:07, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
- Double quotes were changed to single quotes even though
/usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD.proto uses single quotes
Correction: I meant to say that /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD.proto uses
*double* quotes for the pkgdesc field.
Here is the current list of what packages in [core] fail to build from
SVN trunk:
licenses - source checksum issues
libusb-compat:
core.c:91:2: warning: 'enum usbi_log_level' declared inside parameter
list [enabled by default]
core.c:91:2: warning: its scope is only this definition or
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 60 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 17 fully signed off packages
* 359 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Here is the current list of what packages in [core] fail to build from
SVN trunk:
licenses - source checksum issues
libusb-compat:
core.c:91:2: warning: 'enum usbi_log_level' declared inside parameter
list [enabled by
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:07:09 +0300
Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com wrote:
I noticed that all of my community packages were modified by r78782
[1] (Full pkgdesc cleanup for 2339 packages).
This was not discussed beforehand as it should. I would have been
against it and we probably
[2012-10-25 10:07:09 +0300] Evangelos Foutras:
I noticed that all of my community packages were modified by r78782 [1]
(Full pkgdesc cleanup for 2339 packages).
Being a fierce proponent of single quotes myself, your message gave me
the impression that those changes were sane and that you were
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
[2012-10-25 10:07:09 +0300] Evangelos Foutras:
I noticed that all of my community packages were modified by r78782 [1]
(Full pkgdesc cleanup for 2339 packages).
Being a fierce proponent of single quotes myself, your
Hello,
First of all, sorry for not communicating this before making the
changes. I honestly thought this would be considered to be such a
minor change and such a minor issue (even though it affects many
packages), that it would not be worth communicating first. If I had
been aware of previous
Le 2012-10-25 07:39, Alexander Rødseth a écrit :
All that aside, would it be okay for you all if I removed An ..., A
... and Application is ... from the start of all package
descriptions (and making the first letter an uppercase letter)? This
adds no information to the description and (IMO)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
When it comes to double vs single quoting, can we change
PKGBUILD.proto to use single quotes? The character '$' only occurs in
the package description in 3 of the community packages, and those 3
can still use double
Hi Dan,
2012/10/25 Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com:
I think you also missed this case, given that the single quote ' is
used quite regularly in the English language:
You're jumping to conclusions here. If you check the changes I made,
you will see that single quotes within double quotes were
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
All that aside, would it be okay for you all if I removed An ..., A
... and Application is ... from the start of all package
descriptions (and making the first letter an uppercase letter)? This
adds no information to the description and (IMO) looks ugly. Just this
change,
Hello Xyne,
2012/10/25 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
The lack of communication really is the key issue here. It is disrespectful to
other packagers to improve their packages this way.
I disagree with you here, for two reasons. Firstly, I view the package
ownership as a collective ownership, where
On 26 October 2012 01:23, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
All that aside, would it be okay for you all if I removed An ..., A
... and Application is ... from the start of all package
descriptions (and making the first letter an uppercase letter)? This
adds no information
I fully agree with Rashif on this. Thank you.
- Alexander
[2012-10-25 20:58:48 +0200] Alexander Rødseth:
Of course, if people cling to their
packages, believe every man is an island and put much pride in their
package descriptions, I can understand why it can be perceived as
disrespectful
Adding insult to injury - way to go my friend!
Guess where
Hi,
Den 25. okt. 2012 23:41 skrev Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org
følgende:
Adding insult to injury - way to go my friend!
Way to ignore all my points.
Guess where the only pride I can see comes from...
Pride is a large topic. I think it's good to be proud of the work you do
and whatever
17 matches
Mail list logo
