On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
> schrieb Dave Reisner :
>
>> An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the
>> applications which haven't been ported (as to not hold
>> libpurple/pidgin back).
>
> Sounds good to me
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> The rebuild list to add systemd units to packages was created on
> 2012-08-14 but there is still a number of packages in the repos without
> them. Given these packages are effectively unmaintained, I propose we
> remove them from the repos.
>
On 10/30/12, Allan McRae wrote:
> The rebuild list to add systemd units to packages was created on
> 2012-08-14 but there is still a number of packages in the repos without
> them. Given these packages are effectively unmaintained, I propose we
> remove them from the repos.
Just as a side note,
The rebuild list to add systemd units to packages was created on
2012-08-14 but there is still a number of packages in the repos without
them. Given these packages are effectively unmaintained, I propose we
remove them from the repos.
Allan
Am 31.10.2012 00:39, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Am 31.10.2012 00:35, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> We get the discussion on IRC a lot: You need to have some special
>> treatment for xinit/startx to work well with logind. According to Dave,
>> this can be easily fixed.
>>
>> Shouldn't we fix this in our
Am 31.10.2012 00:35, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> We get the discussion on IRC a lot: You need to have some special
> treatment for xinit/startx to work well with logind. According to Dave,
> this can be easily fixed.
>
> Shouldn't we fix this in our xorg-xinit package? I don't know exactly
> how tho
On 31/10/12 09:35, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> We get the discussion on IRC a lot: You need to have some special
> treatment for xinit/startx to work well with logind. According to Dave,
> this can be easily fixed.
>
> Shouldn't we fix this in our xorg-xinit package? I don't know exactly
> how though.
We get the discussion on IRC a lot: You need to have some special
treatment for xinit/startx to work well with logind. According to Dave,
this can be easily fixed.
Shouldn't we fix this in our xorg-xinit package? I don't know exactly
how though.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Am 31.10.2012 00:13, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
> wrote:
>> After upgrading to testing/libtrpc 0.2.2-3 I became unable to use
>> sudo/su/login.
>>
>> Oct 30 23:41:10 mastermind login[27660]: PAM unable to
>> dlopen(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /u
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> After upgrading to testing/libtrpc 0.2.2-3 I became unable to use
> sudo/su/login.
>
> Oct 30 23:41:10 mastermind login[27660]: PAM unable to
> dlopen(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so:
> undefined symbol: log_
On Tuesday 30 October 2012 23:55:34 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After upgrading to testing/libtrpc 0.2.2-3 I became unable to use
> sudo/su/login.
>
> Oct 30 23:41:10 mastermind login[27660]: PAM unable to
> dlopen(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so:
> undefined
Hello,
After upgrading to testing/libtrpc 0.2.2-3 I became unable to use sudo/su/login.
Oct 30 23:41:10 mastermind login[27660]: PAM unable to
dlopen(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so:
undefined symbol: log_debug
Oct 30 23:41:10 mastermind login[27660]: PAM adding faul
Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400
schrieb Dave Reisner :
> An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the
> applications which haven't been ported (as to not hold
> libpurple/pidgin back).
Sounds good to me in this special case. We should do something to
cleanup staging.
Hi,
A former TU has kindly made me aware that it looks like I disagree
with the overall point here, which is that one should not make changes
like the ones I made without first discussing it with the rest of the
maintainers.
I fully agree with this, and has already apologized for doing so, just
to
Am 29.10.2012 19:33, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> We should make it clear that anything that was in our CK removal TODO
> will now stop working without systemd, not only GNOME+NM+polkit.
>
> What about:
>
> "ConsoleKit replaced by logind
>
> With GNOME 3.6, polkit and networkmanager moving to extra,
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 11 fully signed off packages
* 313 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
16 matches
Mail list logo
