[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-02-05 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 26 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 13 fully signed off packages * 37 packages missing signoffs * 10 packages older than 14 days

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-02-05 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi again, If I understand correctly, vim has now been included on the live medium. The vi package has been an orphan for some time now, and remains an orphan. Judging by the comments in this thread, most devs wish to use vim instead of vi. A symlink can be added so that vim provides /usr/bin/vi.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-02-05 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
Hi, I'm late to the party and only have 1 cent to contribute. Based on my own personal experience, after doing minimal config to get archlinux booting on my machine, I reboot and install vim to finish config work. As a result, I will not personally miss vi. I'm also the current maintainer of

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-02-05 Thread Allan McRae
On 06/02/13 12:41, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: My opinion on the vi symlink is that we should just patch the packages which hardcode vi instead of adding the symlink. If it turns out to be too messy, and there is a general consensus on adding a symlink, I would be more than happy to oblige. I am

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-02-05 Thread Allan McRae
On 06/02/13 12:45, Allan McRae wrote: On 06/02/13 12:41, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: My opinion on the vi symlink is that we should just patch the packages which hardcode vi instead of adding the symlink. If it turns out to be too messy, and there is a general consensus on adding a symlink, I