Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Feb 6, 2013 3:09 PM, "Guillaume ALAUX" wrote: > > On 6 February 2013 15:08, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Leonidas Spyropoulos > > Date: 6 February 2013 14:52 > > Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd > > To: guilla...@archlinux.org

Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 6 February 2013 15:08, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Leonidas Spyropoulos > Date: 6 February 2013 14:52 > Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd > To: guilla...@archlinux.org > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: >> O

[arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
-- Forwarded message -- From: Leonidas Spyropoulos Date: 6 February 2013 14:52 Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd To: guilla...@archlinux.org On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> You can a

Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Jan Steffens
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > You can always have each Java runtime provide a different file, and > include all of them in each Java service file using > > EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/one > EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/two

Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-02-06 11:59:22 +0100] Thomas Bächler: > Am 06.02.2013 11:50, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > > Hence I was thinking about a common EnvironmentFile to hold this value > > once and for all. I know these EnvironmentFile _should_ be avoided but > > I think we are in a case where it could be tolerated.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Drop VI from [core] (was Re: [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community])

2013-02-06 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Regardless of the outcome of "symlink vs. fix hardcoded values", could the vi package be dropped? If people wish to configure sudo before installing their preferred vi-compatible editor with pacman, "EDITOR=nano visudo" can be used. - Alexander

Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.02.2013 11:50, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: > Hence I was thinking about a common EnvironmentFile to hold this value > once and for all. I know these EnvironmentFile _should_ be avoided but > I think we are in a case where it could be tolerated. All Java service > file could then just refer to it

[arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd

2013-02-06 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Hi all, I should have posted this a long time ago as suggested by Andy. Basically I would like some advice from the systemd gurus on how to provide a common place to set JAVA_HOME in systemd service files. As you know all Java apps need JAVA_HOME to be set. But as systemd service files do not in

Re: [arch-dev-public] KDE 4.10 enters [testing]

2013-02-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 11:30:25 you wrote: > It's true: KDE 4.10 packages are now available in [testing]. > > See the upstream announcement[1] for more info about this major release. > > Another KDE module has moved to git: kdegames. As side effect the packages > libkdegames and libkmahjon

[arch-dev-public] KDE 4.10 enters [testing]

2013-02-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
It's true: KDE 4.10 packages are now available in [testing]. See the upstream announcement[1] for more info about this major release. Another KDE module has moved to git: kdegames. As side effect the packages libkdegames and libkmahjongg replace kdegames-libkdegames and libkdegames- libkmahjongg

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2013-02-06 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 1 known bad package * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 10 fully signed off packages * 43 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: