On Feb 6, 2013 3:09 PM, "Guillaume ALAUX" wrote:
>
> On 6 February 2013 15:08, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Leonidas Spyropoulos
> > Date: 6 February 2013 14:52
> > Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd
> > To: guilla...@archlinux.org
On 6 February 2013 15:08, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Leonidas Spyropoulos
> Date: 6 February 2013 14:52
> Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd
> To: guilla...@archlinux.org
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> O
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leonidas Spyropoulos
Date: 6 February 2013 14:52
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] JAVA_HOME in systemd
To: guilla...@archlinux.org
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> You can a
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> You can always have each Java runtime provide a different file, and
> include all of them in each Java service file using
>
> EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/one
> EnvironmentFile=-/path/to/java/runtime/number/two
[2013-02-06 11:59:22 +0100] Thomas Bächler:
> Am 06.02.2013 11:50, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
> > Hence I was thinking about a common EnvironmentFile to hold this value
> > once and for all. I know these EnvironmentFile _should_ be avoided but
> > I think we are in a case where it could be tolerated.
Regardless of the outcome of "symlink vs. fix hardcoded values", could
the vi package be dropped?
If people wish to configure sudo before installing their preferred
vi-compatible editor with pacman, "EDITOR=nano visudo" can be used.
- Alexander
Am 06.02.2013 11:50, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
> Hence I was thinking about a common EnvironmentFile to hold this value
> once and for all. I know these EnvironmentFile _should_ be avoided but
> I think we are in a case where it could be tolerated. All Java service
> file could then just refer to it
Hi all,
I should have posted this a long time ago as suggested by Andy.
Basically I would like some advice from the systemd gurus on how to
provide a common place to set JAVA_HOME in systemd service files.
As you know all Java apps need JAVA_HOME to be set. But as systemd
service files do not in
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 11:30:25 you wrote:
> It's true: KDE 4.10 packages are now available in [testing].
>
> See the upstream announcement[1] for more info about this major release.
>
> Another KDE module has moved to git: kdegames. As side effect the packages
> libkdegames and libkmahjon
It's true: KDE 4.10 packages are now available in [testing].
See the upstream announcement[1] for more info about this major release.
Another KDE module has moved to git: kdegames. As side effect the packages
libkdegames and libkmahjongg replace kdegames-libkdegames and libkdegames-
libkmahjongg
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 1 known bad package
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 10 fully signed off packages
* 43 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Note:
11 matches
Mail list logo