Dear Christian,
Thank you for your email.
On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 at 19:08:30, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> inspired by the last thread about moving proprietary software to
> community, our general problem of getting more people involved in Arch
> Linux and the (for me) chaotic
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 04:10:45PM -1000, Public mailing list for Arch Linux
development wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> [2019-06-02 01:08:30 +0200] Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public:
> > inspired by the last thread about moving proprietary software to
> > community, our general problem of
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:07:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 2/6/19 9:08 am, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > 1. Simplified repositories
> >
> > Currently we have [core], [extra] and [community]. These three
> > repositories are there, because they have grown to this
On 2/6/19 9:08 am, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> 1. Simplified repositories
>
> Currently we have [core], [extra] and [community]. These three
> repositories are there, because they have grown to this structure over
> time. At the moment I don't see any real meaning for the
On 6/1/19 7:08 PM, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> Sorry for the huge mail, I didn't thought it would get so long. If you
> feel attacked/angry or whatever about it, take a deep breath before you
> answer. I hope
On 6/1/19 5:43 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 2/6/19 1:53 am, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> You don't seem to
>>> explain why you need to ask in your email.
>>
>> Because it is proprietary and I explain that
Hi Christian,
[2019-06-02 01:08:30 +0200] Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public:
> inspired by the last thread about moving proprietary software to
> community, our general problem of getting more people involved in Arch
> Linux and the (for me) chaotic organisation structure and hierarchy I
>
Hello everybody,
DISCLAIMER:
Sorry for the huge mail, I didn't thought it would get so long. If you
feel attacked/angry or whatever about it, take a deep breath before you
answer. I hope for a constructive discussion without personal attacks.
On 2/6/19 1:53 am, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> You don't seem to
>> explain why you need to ask in your email.
>
> Because it is proprietary and I explain that now there is a valid
> reason compared to 3 years ago where there
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 18:06 +0200, Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Am Sat, 01 Jun 2019 17:53:58 +0200
> schrieb Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public
> :
>
> > On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > > You don't seem to
> > > explain why you need to ask in your email.
>
Am Sat, 01 Jun 2019 17:53:58 +0200
schrieb Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public
:
> On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > You don't seem to
> > explain why you need to ask in your email.
>
> Because it is proprietary and I explain that now there is a valid
> reason compared to
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> You don't seem to
> explain why you need to ask in your email.
Because it is proprietary and I explain that now there is a valid
reason compared to 3 years ago where there was practically no
difference between vivaldi, chromium and opera.
On 1/6/19 8:12 pm, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote:
> 3 years have passed since I first proposed to bring vivaldi into
> community. Now there is a clear differentiation between what vivaldi
> offers out-of-the box compared to other browsers.
>
> Vivaldi offers a ton of customisation
3 years have passed since I first proposed to bring vivaldi into
community. Now there is a clear differentiation between what vivaldi
offers out-of-the box compared to other browsers.
Vivaldi offers a ton of customisation features out of the box, and is
also able to just use the chrome/ium addons
14 matches
Mail list logo
