Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal for a new organisation structure

2019-06-02 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 3/6/19 2:39 pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > 3. I don't like that devs and TUs live aside each other instead of > finally realizing themselves as community or group. The TUs are set up as an independent organisation with their own bylaws. Many of those bylaws were

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal for a new organisation structure

2019-06-02 Thread Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 12:38:24AM -0400, Public mailing list for Arch Linux development wrote: > Dear Christian, > > Thank you for your email. > > I do not share your point of view that the organization is chaotic. You > successfully explained the three roles and each of its duties within two

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal for a new organisation structure

2019-06-02 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public
Em junho 1, 2019 20:08 Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public escreveu: DISCLAIMER: Sorry for the huge mail, I didn't thought it would get so long. If you feel attacked/angry or whatever about it, take a deep breath before you answer. I hope for a constructive

Re: [arch-dev-public] bringing vivaldi browser to community

2019-06-02 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public
On 6/2/19 2:59 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 22:11 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public > wrote: >> On 6/1/19 5:43 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: >>> On 2/6/19 1:53 am, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote: On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae

Re: [arch-dev-public] Proposal for a new organisation structure

2019-06-02 Thread Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public
[2019-06-02 06:06:35 +0200] Christian Rebischke: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 04:10:45PM -1000, Public mailing list for Arch Linux > development wrote: > Thanks for your mail. I remember now that you have told me this some > months ago. This leads to a question: Why are these types of dicussions >

Re: [arch-dev-public] bringing vivaldi browser to community

2019-06-02 Thread Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 12:12 +0200, Ike Devolder wrote: > 3 years have passed since I first proposed to bring vivaldi into > community. Now there is a clear differentiation between what vivaldi > offers out-of-the box compared to other browsers. > > Vivaldi offers a ton of customisation features

Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 9 removed from [testing]

2019-06-02 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public
On 02/06/2019 09.37, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 26/05/2019 22.39, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: >> Question: are you going to set up an archbuild alias on soyuz/dragon for >> this, the way you did for gcc8? (Which reminds me, those archbuild >> aliases still

Re: [arch-dev-public] GCC 9 removed from [testing]

2019-06-02 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public
On 26/05/2019 22.39, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > Question: are you going to set up an archbuild alias on soyuz/dragon for > this, the way you did for gcc8? (Which reminds me, those archbuild > aliases still exist and could be deleted). I can create it, sure. > Also please bump the

Re: [arch-dev-public] bringing vivaldi browser to community

2019-06-02 Thread Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 22:11 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 6/1/19 5:43 PM, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On 2/6/19 1:53 am, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > You don't seem to > > > >