On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 13:08 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 4/1/20 12:47 pm, Sébastien Luttringer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > One unfortunate consequence could be to have packages rely on it to make
> > dependencies shorter, and make us pull cups or cronie.
>
> What?! That
On 4/1/20 12:47 pm, Sébastien Luttringer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> One unfortunate consequence could be to have packages rely on it to make
> dependencies shorter, and make us pull cups or cronie.
What?! That is like saying one unfortunate consequence of pamcan hooks
is that packages can have
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 11:11 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 1/3/20 10:48 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 23:35 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
>
> I would argue that POSIX is a standard which people
On 2/01/2020 17:24, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 1/2/20 11:12 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
>> # Remove python2 support
>>
>> * pycharm-community-edition - remove python2 support
>
> Seems reasonable to not encourage people to use python2 in an IDE these
> days.
>
>> * vim -
On 1/3/20 10:48 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 23:35 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Posix is an old standard which fail to make a common ground to Unix systems.
>
> If we think user needs meta packages to install their Arch,
On 1/3/20 10:22 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:49:11PM +0100, Robin Broda via arch-dev-public
> wrote:
>> On 1/3/20 5:35 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>> After a bit of research work and making sure one or two things have been
>>>
On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 23:35 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> ...
>
> Thoughts?
Posix is an old standard which fail to make a common ground to Unix systems.
If we think user needs meta packages to install their Arch, is the Linux
Standard Base more relevant to us?
Cheers,
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:49:11PM +0100, Robin Broda via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 1/3/20 5:35 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > After a bit of research work and making sure one or two things have been
> > properly packaged, I've developed a PKGBUILD which ensures that a system
>
On 1/3/20 5:35 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> After a bit of research work and making sure one or two things have been
> properly packaged, I've developed a PKGBUILD which ensures that a system
> has the POSIX shell and utilities (XCU) section installed. I believe
> this is an
On 01/02/20 at 11:18am, Santiago Torres-Arias via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 05:12:33PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > For packages still providing python2 functionality such as vim and
> > others I propose we remove python2 support to actively to discourage
> >
On 01/02/20 at 07:09pm, keenerd via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 1/2/20, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > * armagetronad - dead upstream, optional dep can be removed
>
> Fixed instead. It still works a treat.
Thanks a lot! This was my hidden agenda all along ^_^
I've found many packages which have
Le jeu. 2 janv. 2020 à 17:12, Jelle van der Waa a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> 2020 happened and Python 2 is very much still alive, even worse there
> will be an update in April.
>
> However we should actively strive to get rid of Python 2 before it. Some
> upstreams are (still) working on porting to
12 matches
Mail list logo
