Re: [arch-dev-public] Use detached package signatures by default

2020-07-08 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 9/7/20 1:05 pm, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Given this information I would like to propose to stop using embedded > signatures and move to detached signatures by default. This will > require pacman 6.x or as alternative backport the fix(es) to 5.x > branch. It will help to make system updates even

Re: [arch-dev-public] Use detached package signatures by default

2020-07-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public
On 7/8/20 11:05 PM, Anatol Pomozov via arch-dev-public wrote: > TLDR; let’s start using detached package signatures to make system > updates faster. That all sounds great, but it's really down to how repo-add does its thing. So maybe this belongs on pacman-dev? -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and

[arch-dev-public] Use detached package signatures by default

2020-07-08 Thread Anatol Pomozov via arch-dev-public
TLDR; let’s start using detached package signatures to make system updates faster. Hi folks, Some time ago there was a discussion at IRC where someone (Allan maybe?) proposed to stop using embedded PGP signatures in favor of detached signature files. I would like to bring this idea here and

[arch-dev-public] help wanted / IPP based printing/scanning

2020-07-08 Thread Andreas Radke via arch-dev-public
There's some major effort going on to move from driver based scanning and printing to driverless scanning and printing both based on IPP specifications offered by newer devices. While IPP based printing is already there for some time and usable with cups+cups-filters [1] there's more work going