On 24/01/13 13:56, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>> aspell-nl
>>> hyphen-nl
>
> I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them
> supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from
> me.
>
> Ronald
>
If
Hi,
2013/1/24 Allan McRae :
> I agree with just dumping vi and moving [vim] to core... But we can not
> put split packages across repos and gvim and deps are not going there so
> that is a no...
That is fully understandable. I guess unsplitting vim/gvim is not a
viable option either.
I see tha
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> aspell-nl
>> hyphen-nl
I can take these two in [extra] just for the sake of keeping them
supported. If anyone else is more interested feel free to take it from
me.
Ronald
On Thursday 24 January 2013 13:08:23 Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> A total of 23 [community] packages will be moved to unsupported. 1
> package were already moved to unsupported and 4 other packages were
> adopted.
+1
> archlinux-wallpaper
It's a pity. I could take it just to keep it in [extra] (no
On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> === [core] ===
>
> For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make
> dependencies for any other [core] packages:
>
> openldap
> vi
>
> If I may be so bold, maybe vim or another editor (still providing the
> "vi" command) could take o
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> lua-sql-mysql
> lua-sql-postgres
> lua-sql-sqlite
This is part of split package luasql, which was maintained by Sergey
and was renamed during lua 5.2 upgrade. I believe he does't take it
again on archweb.
Cheers,
--
Sébastien "Seblu" Lu
Hi,
Several of the uneeded orphans has been adopted, which is great.
=== [community] ===
Here is the list for [community], that I'll now move to unsupported:
dcron
espeakup
gmerlin-avdecoder
iksemel
isomaster
libmatio
libtlen
libxml-perl
lua-sql-mysql
lua-sql-postgres
lua-sql-sqlite
mget
mult
[2013-01-21 00:05:32 +0100] Alexander Rødseth:
> I also think non-devs and non-TUs may have valuable insights for why
> for instance a package should be considered to be too important to not
> be moved to unsupported.
Sure. Users sometimes make insightful points on what is being discussed
on arch-
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> ndisc6
I took this one. I use it.
Cheers,
--
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://www.seblu.net
GPG: 0x2072D77A
Hi,
@Fons Adriaensen
Didn't think of that, here's the current list:
dcron
espeakup
gmerlin-avdecoder
i2c-tools
iksemel
isomaster
libmatio
libtlen
libtxc_dxtn
libxml-perl
lua-sql-mysql
lua-sql-postgres
lua-sql-sqlite
mget
multipath-tools
ndisc6
nvclock
pam-krb5
perl-text-wrapi18n
pidgin-musictrac
[2013-01-19 17:54:51 +0100] Alexander Rødseth:
> It's time again for the yearly cleanup of the [community] repository.
Please send such messages to arch-dev-public in the future: adopting
packages are dev's and TU's decision, and not all read arch-general.
> Somehow, time passed, and it's now too
11 matches
Mail list logo