Am 18.10.2013 03:01, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400
schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of
making !libtool the default in makepkg.conf. Currently, 104 packages
On 20/10/13 21:17, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 18.10.2013 03:01, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400
schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of
making !libtool the
On 17/10/13 01:18, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:18:00 -0400
schrieb Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com:
I just discussed on IRC with Allan about the possibility of
making !libtool the default in makepkg.conf. Currently, 104 packages
contains *.la files (mostly gambas
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote:
All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added
options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with
the idea of enabling it by default.
My
On 29/09/13 17:36, Allan McRae wrote:
All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added
options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with
the idea of enabling it by default.
My plan is:
- build pacman with updated makepkg.conf
- update devtools to
All this recent talk about static libs reminded me that we added
options=(!staticlibs) to makepkg-4.1 to automatically remove them, with
the idea of enabling it by default.
My plan is:
- build pacman with updated makepkg.conf
- update devtools to have this in the makepkg.conf
- set up a
Sounds good. The few packages that should need options=(!staticlibs)
can just use that.
Also, it would be possible to create a TODO for the packages that
currently include static libraries.
---
Best regards,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
7 matches
Mail list logo